Why Do I Struggle with Calculating Limits in Improper Integrals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Asclepius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding improper integrals, specifically the integral from negative infinity to zero of the function xe^(-x^2). The original poster expresses confusion regarding the evaluation of limits in this context and seeks clarity on the convergence of the integral.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the evaluation of limits as they relate to the integral, questioning the behavior of terms involving negative powers and infinity. There is discussion about the implications of squaring negative infinity and the resulting exponential behavior.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts, offering insights into the treatment of infinity and limits. Some guidance has been provided regarding the rewriting of the integral and the importance of understanding the properties of infinity in mathematical expressions. However, there is no explicit consensus on the best approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the original poster's struggle with improper integrals as a review for an upcoming exam, highlighting the need for clarity on foundational concepts. Participants also note the importance of careful language when discussing infinity in mathematical contexts.

Asclepius
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is not a homework problem per se, I'm just reviewing old material for my upcoming final examination in my calculus course and find improper integrals are a weak point of mine. I've picked a fairly simple example that I'm having problems grasping.

It is the integral from -infinity to 0 of [tex]\int(xe^-x^2) dx[/tex]

(I'm sorry I don't really know how to use Latex properly.)

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I undertand that after we evaluate the integral, we get the limit as t--> -infinity [-1/2 + 1/2e^(-t^2)]

Now, I already know the answer will come out to -1/2, therefore making the second limit convergent and equal to 0. Why is this? I think I'm getting confused trying to square -infinity, then take the negative of THAT, then raise e to that number. I'm very confused here, is there an easy way to look at these problems? I try to look at the graph in my head, but that always ends up giving me the wrong answer.

Any tips for how to attack these problems would be very much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Remeber what happens when you have a number raised to a negative power ex. x^(-2)=1/(x^2) so the limit as x approaches infinity ultimately brings this term to zero. This is basically what happens to the -t^2 in your problem. its like [-1/2+1/2(1/(e^t^2))]
 
Right, that's a good point. So if it was -1/2*e^(t^2) as t---> -inf, this would be divergent, correct? Because we square -inf to get +inf, and therefore have e^inf, right? And I don't believe the graph of e^x ever hits an asymptote.

By the way, thanks trajan; sometimes its such a simple point one overlooks. I smacked my forehead when I read your post!
 
Well nearly correct you would have the limit approach -infinity because e^x is multiplied by the -1/2. But just a word of warning when speaking math one shouldn't refer to infinity as a number, it is more of an expression meaning that the term gets larger all the time. So on work try not to put things like 1+(infinity) or e^(infinity) the professor will most likely mark off points for things like that.
 
You want to solve the definite integral
[tex]\int^0_{-\infty} xe^{-x^2} dx[/tex].

To do so, rewrite as such : [tex]\lim_{a\to-\infty} \int^0_a xe^{-x^2} dx[/tex].

Now let [itex]u=-x^2[/itex] and evaluate the indefinite integral. You have to work it out for yourself, but I'm going to call it F(x) for now.

Once You have the anti derivative, The Solution to your integral is just:
[tex]F(0) - \lim_{a\to-\infty} F(a)[/tex]
 
Use the substution u=- x2. You are very fortunate to have that "x" multiplying [itex]e^{x^2}[/itex]!

The proble with your LaTex is that you need { }.
e^{-x^2} will give
[tex]e^{-x^2}[/tex]
 
Thanks very much all.

Trajan, you were mentioning I should be wary of treating infinity as an actual number, and I've actually wondered about this. What properties does infinity have in common with "real," numbers; for example +inf * -1 is -inf, right? I know it's a stupid question, but I want to make sure I understand all the properties.
 
There are certain things you have to be careful about.

1^a = 1 for any real a.

But if you had a limit question, 1^infinity is not always 1.

For no real number b can 1/b =0. But if b is infinity it is.

Your example is correct.

Infinity + negative infinity is not always zero.

infinity/infinity is not always 1.
 
The best explanation that I could find on the way to treat infinity is here
http://www.math.vanderbilt.edu/~schectex/commerrs/
just control f and type in infinity, it is in the other common calculus errors section. If you have studied limits with l`hospitals rules then you should understand how to treat the forms of (inf)/(inf) (notice that this is called a form and not an actual arithmetic operation) and also the form of (inf)^(inf) as well as a few others.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K