Why do paired electrons have no magnetic field lines?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the analogy of paired electrons and their magnetic properties, specifically addressing why paired electrons exhibit no net magnetic field despite having opposite spins. The Pauli exclusion principle dictates that paired electrons have opposite spins, leading to the cancellation of their magnetic moments, resulting in a diamagnetic state. However, the conversation highlights the limitations of classical analogies, such as bar magnets, in accurately representing quantum mechanical behavior. Unlike classical objects, electrons do not have definite positions or orientations, making it challenging to find suitable analogs. The mathematical description of electron states, particularly through wave functions, further complicates the understanding, as these functions do not correspond to classical coordinates. The discussion concludes that while classical analogies can provide some insight, they ultimately fall short in capturing the complexities of quantum mechanics.
adf89812
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Why do paired electrons have no magnetic field lines?
If you think of electrons with spin as bar magnets, you know bar magnets of opposite polarity when put next to each other in any respective rotation don't cancel each other's magnetic field out. So what's a more apt analogy for electron paired have no magnetic field?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Paired electrons have opposite spin due to pauli exclusion principle.As for the magnetic moment , it becomes diamagnetic because the oppositely spinning electron generate opposite poles/magnetic moment which cancel each other out . As for the bar magnet analogy , give me some time and ill get back to you
 
adf89812 said:
So what's a more apt analogy for electron paired have no magnetic field?
There may not be any.
The problem is that the quantum mechanical behavior of particles like electrons has no good classical analogs. Bar magnets, like all classical objects, have a definite position and orientation in space; we use these properties to calculate the magnetic field of two nearby bar magnets. But these methods won't work for bound electrons which have neither a definite position nor orientation, nor will any other analogy based on classical objects. Instead we have to learn and trust the math without falling back on our classical intuitioin about how this "ought to" behave.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby and PhysicsEnjoyer31415
Nugatory said:
There may not be any.
The problem is that the quantum mechanical behavior of particles like electrons has no good classical analogs. Bar magnets, like all classical objects, have a definite position and orientation in space; we use these properties to calculate the magnetic field of two nearby bar magnets. But these methods won't work for bound electrons which have neither a definite position nor orientation, nor will any other analogy based on classical objects. Instead we have to learn and trust the math without falling back on our classical intuitioin about how this "ought to" behave.
I drew a bar magnetic and its magnetic field in powerpoint. Then I copied it and pasted it and flipped the picture. I made the two images transparent, and consistent with a Halbach array, I understand that magnetic fields can cancel out, I realize two paired electrons can have no net magnetic field if they occupy the same position in space. So do paired electrons always have the same spherical coordinates?
 
adf89812 said:
I drew a bar magnetic and its magnetic field in powerpoint. Then I copied it and pasted it and flipped the picture. I made the two images transparent, and consistent with a Halbach array, I understand that magnetic fields can cancel out, I realize two paired electrons can have no net magnetic field if they occupy the same position in space. So do paired electrons always have the same spherical coordinates?
They don’t have any coordinates, at least not the way you’re thinking about coordinates, and they do not have a position in space. The state of the two-electron system is described by a mathematical object (informally called the “wave function”) that can be written in spherical coordinates - but if so the function has six arguments and is complex-valued so doesn’t correspond to any classical.
 
adf89812 said:
you know bar magnets of opposite polarity when put next to each other in any respective rotation don't cancel each other's magnetic field out
They do far away. And atoms are small.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top