Why Do Physicists Use the Term Unity Instead of 1 in Crystallography?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter denjay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Unity
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 3K views
denjay
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
I came across this term in Elements of Modern X-ray Physics by Nielsen. I'm assuming this term isn't specific to the book (because that would be ridiculous). I've always taken math courses geared toward Physics/Engineering so some math terms were never used so this is probably one of them.

I'm assuming it is somehow equivalent to 1. I just don't know why the author did not say 1 instead of unity.

The context in which it was used was
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    10.4 KB · Views: 552
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's really just a word used to sound more pretentious than saying "one." It might be handy to distinguish 1 of some unit of measure versus 1 as a pure number, but that's about it.
 
I suppose it makes sense to use unity instead of 1 for units. Especially in a Physics textbook.

Thank you sir and/or ma'am.
 
Unity is a unitless one. It is also used extensively in ring theory so that the theorems can be extended to systems that do not use numbers. I doubt the second part is the reason in an X-ray physics book.