Why Do Protesters Gather at the Spelling Bee?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pattonias
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the protests occurring at the Scripps National Spelling Bee, specifically focusing on the topic of phonetic spelling versus traditional spelling. Participants express various opinions on the implications of changing spelling conventions, the motivations behind the protests, and the broader impact on education and communication.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express disbelief at the protests, labeling them as "ridiculous" and suggesting that they promote a dumbing down of language.
  • Others argue that traditional spelling is a barrier to literacy and job opportunities, citing the costs associated with illiteracy.
  • A few participants propose radical changes to spelling, such as assigning unique characters to each word or adopting a phonetic system similar to Chinese.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of phonetic spelling on communication, with suggestions that it could lead to the use of text speak.
  • Some participants share personal grievances about specific American spellings and the use of imperial units, expressing frustration with the differences between American and British English.
  • A participant mentions a protester's statement about young people's communication preferences, questioning the effectiveness of their message.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion features multiple competing views regarding the merits and drawbacks of phonetic spelling versus traditional spelling. There is no consensus on the issue, with participants expressing a range of opinions and concerns.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various assumptions about literacy, educational standards, and cultural implications of spelling reforms, but these assumptions are not universally accepted or explored in depth.

  • #61
zomgwtf said:
However in your case apparently when someone says 'Amerian' it invokes thoughts of intolerance and hate?

Not trying to provoke anything here, but that's really what it does to most people, at least around here in Sweden.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Well that's because your not american of course your going to protest that sweden is the best and if people act like america is better you will naturally not agree.
 
  • #63
DaveC426913 said:
Sounds a lot like American White Supremacy.

Or it could be a tongue in cheek comment about how I feel about our illegal immigration "crisis".
 
  • #64
magpies said:
Well that's because your not american of course your going to protest that sweden is the best and if people act like america is better you will naturally not agree.

Sweden is great in many ways and terrible in many ways. I don't identify myself with my nation. I don't think I'd rather live in America, though.
 
  • #65
BobG said:
Why do we use the Italian word for zucchini when we already have an English word for it - courgette?
:smile: Yes, the word that they stole from the French. That would be much nicer. That way when you have a whole bushel of zuccini to unload on neighbors, you can ambush them with a word that sounds like you might be giving them something they actually want.

Thanks to French nobility residing in England, many of the English words for food products are derived from the French and NOT from English. Nobility did not have to tend kine, swine or sheep, but they loved to eat beef, pork, and mutton - all derived from the French.
 

Similar threads

Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
8K