Why Do Resonance Structures for ClO- and ClO4- Differ in Formal Charges?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathewsMD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Structures
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the resonance structures of the chlorite ion (ClO-) and the perchlorate ion (ClO4-), specifically addressing the differences in formal charges and the implications for bond order. Participants explore theoretical aspects of resonance structures, formal charge distribution, and bonding characteristics in these compounds.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why ClO- has two resonance structures, one with a negative formal charge on oxygen and another with a negative formal charge on chlorine, despite oxygen's higher electronegativity.
  • Another participant notes that resonance structures are not experimentally observable and suggests reliance on calculations to understand bonding in these compounds.
  • A participant seeks confirmation on the average bond orders for ClO- and ClO4-, asking if these values explain the absence of certain resonance structures.
  • There is a query about the existence of other molecules where a formal negative charge is assigned to a less electronegative atom, as well as cases of positive formal charges on more electronegative atoms.
  • One participant asserts that bonding in these compounds is highly ionic, denying the presence of covalent double bonds between Cl and O.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of resonance structures and bonding in ClO- and ClO4-. There is no consensus on the implications of formal charge distribution or the existence of additional resonance structures.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that resonance structures serve as visual aids and that actual bonding is represented by resonance hybrids. There is an emphasis on the complexity of bonding in higher main group compounds, and the discussion includes references to calculations and theoretical models without resolving the mathematical details.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and professionals in chemistry, particularly those focused on molecular structure, resonance theory, and bonding in main group elements.

MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
Hi,

When drawing the resonance structures for ClO-, two exist. One where the O has a formal charge of -1 and there is then a single bond. The other structure is Cl with -1 for formal charge. Why is this second structure an equal resonance structure (why does the Cl have a negative formal charge) when O has the higher electronegativity?

Also, my next question stem from the previous one. In ClO4-, you have 4 resonance structures where the negative formal charge alternates between the 4 oxygen atoms, and the average bond order is 7/4. Why does a fifth resonance structure not exist where the chlorine has the negative formal charge, and makes a double bond with EACH oxygen atom?

It seems like Cl can have a negative formal charge in ClO- and not ClO4-, and I would like an explanation for that, if possible.

Thanks!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
This are good questions. As resonance structures aren't observable experimentally, you have to rely on calculations. If you look at these, there is in fact no double bond between Cl and O and O is either neutral or carries a negative formal charge.
 
DrDu said:
This are good questions. As resonance structures aren't observable experimentally, you have to rely on calculations. If you look at these, there is in fact no double bond between Cl and O and O is either neutral or carries a negative formal charge.

Ok. I understand the basics of resonance structures. I realize Lewis structures are used as visual aids, and are never in this form at any time, while the actual structure is only the hybrid. Just to confirm, you're saying the calculated average bond order is 1.5 for ClO- and 7/4 for ClO4-, and that is the reason the the other possible structures are not considered, right? Are there any other molecules like ClO- where the formal negative charge in the drawn Lewis structures goes to the less electronegative atom? How about for a positive formal charge on the more electronegative atom?

Also, do you mind shedding some light on how average bond order is actually calculated using a method besides Lewis structures?
 
No, I am saying that bonding has I high degree of ionicity in these compounds and that there are certainly no covalent double bonds between Cl and O in these compounds. Bonding in higher main group compounds is not that simple. A classic is the following article, which you may obtain via your library:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.198402721/abstract
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K