JaredJames
- 2,818
- 22
lisab said:Some of the guests needed remedial lessons on how to wear a hat.
And they had etiquette lessons.
lisab said:Some of the guests needed remedial lessons on how to wear a hat.
Some needed to be told what a hat is.lisab said:Some of the guests needed remedial lessons on how to wear a hat.
qspeechc said:...it's for the British to decide, and most of the British public are in favour of keeping them...The British royal family is a part of British culture, it's a part of Britain. Take away the royal family and
you take away a very large part of British history and culture.
hypatia said:...Prince William looked so much like his mother, in his reserved and shy looks.
Jack21222 said:As a comparison, the World Cup Final was estimated to have only 700 million viewers. The claim is that THREE TIMES as many people worldwide watched some stupid wedding than the world's most popular sport's championship game.
Jack21222 said:When Marie Antionette said "if they can't afford bread, let them eat cake," the French people at least had the common decency to behead her. Confiscate the nice cash reserve and kick the queen to the curb.
lisab said:Some of the guests needed remedial lessons on how to wear a hat.
Evo said:I heard that the middletons are paying $100,000 of the costs, the Royals the balance, and tax payers transportation and security.
At least Kate had a beautiful, elegant dress. That fiasco Diana wore was the ugliest wedding dress I've ever seen. I was shocked and disappointed when I saw the thing, I was expecting something elegant, instead it was a gawdy creation of huge poofs on her arms and a tacky neckline.
In my survey, 100% watched :)I surveyed the members of my household, a typical family and then extrapolated to the population of the world. It turns out that nobody saw the wedding.
Shaun_W said:God this royal wedding crap reminds me how backward we are in Britain compared to many other parts of the developed world. Yanks and other foreigners might have been watching in large numbers, but they sure as hell weren't going "hey look, this Britain place looks like a really good example of a modern democratic country".
It's all a bit of a novelty to them.
lisab said:Some of the guests needed remedial lessons on how to wear a hat.
xxChrisxx said:Luck isn't really needed ths time, and William and Kate actually want to get married.
AlephZero said:The essential characteristic of the British upper class is that you behave at all times as if nobody except oneself exists. Therefore, the concept of "lessons" is meaningless, since by definition teachers do not exist.
Miss Manners is only for the peasants.
BobG said:Even though his father, the King of Yugoslavia, passed away, the Crown Prince can't ascend to the throne because the Yugoslavia he's Crown Prince of ceased to exist 4 months after he was born. But he doesn't lose his Crown Princehood just because his kingdom no longer exists.
elabed haidar said:its just a wedding why the big fuss?
AlephZero said:So did Charles and Di. The only problem was that they got married to each other.
JaredJames said:What you mean by the fact we removed any power they had and replaced it with what has been one of the worlds best governments, all whilst not having to resort to wiping them out in some way? Yep, stinks of bad example...
And it wasn't to us?
Shaun_W said:The queen is still the head of state. We had a massive ceremony today to celebrate the marriage of someone who will probably be the next head of state solely due to bloodline. A lot of fuss was made that one of the partners in marriage is a "commoner".
Now I don't think that they should be killed or any harm committed towards them but I think that we should do away will all of this nonsense and become a republic.
A hell of a lot of people in Britain take this stuff very seriously.
JaredJames said:Doesn't change the fact it's a novelty event. If it happened often, it wouldn't get anywhere near the attention.
Alfi said:The Royal wedding ... reduced to a 'novelty event'.
Without actually knowing ... just let me guess ... JaredJames is an American.
lisab said:No, Jared isn't American.
JaredJames said:They do no harm and bring in a lot of tourism. Do away with them and you lose a lot.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/apr/29/royal-wedding-tourism-boost
The UK has little going for it so far as tourism goes, they are one of the major attractions.
Besides, they still have no power. It's all ceremony and ritual.
Doesn't change the fact it's a novelty event. If it happened often, it wouldn't get anywhere near the attention.
The fact one of them was a commoner really is something new and a major novelty.
Alfi said:I'm surprised. Perhaps my prejudice is showing. My apologies.
Alfi said:The Royal wedding ... reduced to a 'novelty event'.
Without actually knowing ... just let me guess ... JaredJames is an American.
I'll let him back up his 'fact' in any way he can.
lisab said:...but I'm sure he was using "novelty" to mean "rarity".
JaredJames said:I'm Welsh.
nucleargirl said:aww JNJ, I commend your efforts to stick up for old Blighty.
JaredJames said:I'm Welsh.
Check the definition of 'novelty' in a dictionary.
These are one off events that don't occur often. It's something of a novelty for the British public to celebrate this.
