Why Do Spring Constants Vary With Different Calculation Methods?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of spring constants using two different methods: force equilibrium and energy conservation. The first method yields a spring constant of 98 N/m, while the second method results in 196 N/m. The discrepancy arises from the conditions under which the calculations are made; the force method assumes static equilibrium, while the energy method does not account for kinetic energy contributions when the mass is released. Understanding these principles is crucial for correctly applying the equations of motion and energy in spring systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and spring constants
  • Knowledge of gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy equations
  • Familiarity with forces acting on objects on an incline
  • Basic principles of static equilibrium in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of Hooke's Law in various contexts
  • Learn about energy conservation principles in mechanical systems
  • Explore the effects of friction on inclined planes and spring systems
  • Investigate the dynamics of oscillating springs and their energy transformations
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone involved in mechanical engineering or dynamics who seeks to deepen their understanding of spring mechanics and energy conservation principles.

mike115
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Spring - Forces or Energy?

Homework Statement


A spring of length 0.80 m rests along a frictionless 30 degree incline. A 2.0 kg mass, at rest against the end of the spring, compresses the spring by 0.10 m.
A) Determine the spring constant k .
B) The mass is pushed down, compressing the spring an additional 0.60 m, and then released. If the incline is 2.0m long, determine how far beyond the rightmost edge of the incline the mass lands.


Homework Equations


Fspr = k*x
Wspr = .5*k*x^2


The Attempt at a Solution


For part A, I get two different answers for the spring constant depending on whether I try to use forces or energy. Can somebody explain why one way is correct? Why doesn't forces/energy give the correct answer?

Fspr = Fg parallel to the incline
k*x = m*g*sin(30)
k*.1 = 2*9.8*sin(30)
k = 98 N/m

Wspr = PEg
.5*k*x^2 = m*g*x*sin(30)
.5*k*.1^2 = 2*9.8*.1*sin(30)
k = 196 N/m

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you can't blindly use those equations for potential energy. you have to think about what you are doing. there would be a kinetic contribution if the box were just to drop down on the spring.

as it is you can suppose that someone slowly let the box set down and compress the spring. the spring did work on the box etc etc, but who cares.

use the fact that the box is already just sitting there (regardless of how the box got there) at rest (not accelerating either) so that the forces must be equal.
 


can you explain how to do part B

im not exactly sure how to set it up
heres what i have:

(mass = 2.4 kg and k = 117.72 N/m)

(PEg + PEs)i = (PEg + KE)f
mgh + .5kx^2 = mgh + .5mv^2

2.4 kg (9.81 m/s^2) (0.1 m) sin 30 + .5(117.72 N/m)(0.60 m)^2 = 2.4 kg (9.81m/s^2)(0.70 m) sin 30 + .5(2.4 kg) v^2

what I am most confused about is where I should consider "final" to find velocity
so for example is it when the spring is completely relaxed or is it when the mass is resting on it (compressing it .1 m)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K