High School Why Do We Use Different Pairs of Filters to Determine the Temperature of Stars?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the use of different filter pairs, specifically R-I for cool stars and B-V for hotter stars, in determining stellar temperatures. It is established that using appropriate filters enhances measurement accuracy by maximizing photon capture, as cool stars emit less visible light in higher frequencies. The relationship between filter choice and the accuracy of temperature calculations is emphasized, with the understanding that fewer photons lead to greater measurement errors due to the Poisson distribution of photon counts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stellar color indices (U-B, B-V, V-R)
  • Knowledge of blackbody radiation and peak wavelength concepts
  • Familiarity with photometric filters and their bandpasses
  • Basic principles of photon statistics and measurement accuracy
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of different photometric filters on stellar photometry
  • Explore the relationship between stellar temperature and color indices
  • Learn about the Poisson distribution and its implications for photon counting
  • Investigate advanced techniques for measuring faint astronomical objects
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students studying stellar photometry and temperature determination methods will benefit from this discussion.

heavystray
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
Hi, in determining the temperature of stars using colour index (U-B,B-V,V-R, etc), why do we need to use the appropriate pairs of filters based on their range of temperature? (this is what i read from wiki)

For cool stars, we use R-I, and for hotter stars, we use B-V. I don't understand how using different pairs of filters make a difference because isn't radiation curve of blackbodies with different temperature have different shape and thus, the values of (B-V, U-B, V-R) will also be different? (I hope you understand what I'm trying too say)

My idea is this has to do with the star's peak wavelength...but i still don't see the justification to that...
your help would be greatly appreciated
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
heavystray said:
For cool stars, we use R-I, and for hotter stars, we use B-V. I don't understand how using different pairs of filters make a difference because isn't radiation curve of blackbodies with different temperature have different shape and thus, the values of (B-V, U-B, V-R) will also be different? (I hope you understand what I'm trying too say)

I'm betting that astronomers use the R-I filters instead of the B-V filters for cooler stars so that you don't block out most of the light. Cool stars don't put out much visible light in the higher frequencies, so using a bandpass in the red-infrared range makes them easier to see and measure.
 
Drakkith said:
I'm betting that astronomers use the R-I filters instead of the B-V filters for cooler stars so that you don't block out most of the light. Cool stars don't put out much visible light in the higher frequencies, so using a bandpass in the red-infrared range makes them easier to see and measure.

Right. Look at this plot showing the filter bandpasses with a 3000 K (red) blackbody and a 10,000K (blue) blackbody. You can see that the hot blue star doesn't have much light in the I band, and the cool red star doesn't have much in the B band.
Filter.png
 

Attachments

  • Filter.png
    Filter.png
    15.5 KB · Views: 913
phyzguy said:
Right. Look at this plot showing the filter bandpasses with a 3000 K (red) blackbody and a 10,000K (blue) blackbody. You can see that the hot blue star doesn't have much light in the I band, and the cool red star doesn't have much in the B band.
View attachment 219165
but the question is, why does it affect the accuracy of temperature calculated based on the star's U-/B/B-V/V-R?? because we're just going to get either lower or higher values of B-V, V-R, R-I which correspond to temperatures. I mean for cooler stars, we already expected their U-B will be low. so, it shouldn't be a problem to determine their temperature based on the U-B value. Isn't the accuracy going to be just the same if we determine the temperature using R-I filters? (i hope you understand my question)

thanks for your answer
 
Drakkith said:
I'm betting that astronomers use the R-I filters instead of the B-V filters for cooler stars so that you don't block out most of the light. Cool stars don't put out much visible light in the higher frequencies, so using a bandpass in the red-infrared range makes them easier to see and measure.
yes it's easier to measure, but the question is, why does it affect the accuracy of temperature calculated based on the star's U-/B/B-V/V-R?? because we're just going to get either lower or higher values of B-V, V-R, R-I which correspond to temperatures. I mean for cooler stars, we already expected their U-B will be low. so, it shouldn't be a problem to determine their temperature based on the U-B value. Isn't the accuracy going to be just the same if we determine the temperature using R-I filters? (i hope you understand my question)

thanks for your answer
 
heavystray said:
yes it's easier to measure, but the question is, why does it affect the accuracy of temperature calculated based on the star's U-/B/B-V/V-R?? because we're just going to get either lower or higher values of B-V, V-R, R-I which correspond to temperatures. I mean for cooler stars, we already expected their U-B will be low. so, it shouldn't be a problem to determine their temperature based on the U-B value. Isn't the accuracy going to be just the same if we determine the temperature using R-I filters? (i hope you understand my question)

The lower the light intensity, the fewer photons there are to measure and the lower the accuracy. If you take a star, which is dim to begin with, then add a filter that removes most of the photons, you can end up with a surprisingly small number of photons. Since the photons are distributed according to a Poisson distribution, the error goes down as 1/(sqrt(N). So the more photons you have, the smaller the error.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MoM-z14 Any photon with energy above 24.6 eV is going to ionize any atom. K, L X-rays would certainly ionize atoms. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/whats-the-most-distant-galaxy/ The James Webb Space Telescope has found the most distant galaxy ever seen, at the dawn of the cosmos. Again. https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/news/webb-mom-z14 A Cosmic Miracle: A Remarkably Luminous Galaxy at zspec = 14.44 Confirmed with JWST...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K