Why Do We Use the Reciprocal in Fraction Division?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Taylor_1989
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fractions Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that using the reciprocal in fraction division is rooted in the definition of division as the inverse of multiplication. Dividing by a fraction is equivalent to multiplying by its reciprocal. An algebraic proof illustrates this concept, showing that n = (a/b) ÷ (c/d) can be rewritten as n = (a/b) × (d/c). Participants express appreciation for the proof, highlighting its clarity in understanding the concept. The explanation emphasizes the mathematical relationship between division and multiplication in the context of fractions.
Taylor_1989
Messages
400
Reaction score
14
Could someone show me the proof to why we use the reciprocal in fractions division. I ask this because it seem we are taught the how in math but never the why. Algebra proof would be best thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's not a proof, it's a definition. Division is the inverse operation of multiplication, and so dividing by a fraction is the same as multiplying by the inverse of that fraction, which is its reciprocal.
 
My LaTeX always looks so ugly.

n = \frac{(\frac{a}{b})}{(\frac{c}{d})}
n\left(\frac{c}{d}\right) = \frac{a}{b}
nc = \frac{ad}{b}
n = \frac{ad}{bc} = \left(\frac{a}{b}\right) \times \left(\frac{d}{c}\right)
 
Thanks for the proof abacus, well appreciated makes things clearer for me.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
47
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top