MHB Why Do We Use The with Calculus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nikkor180
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus
nikkor180
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
In English grammar, we typically refer to specific branches of mathematics without a prefixed article; e.g., solve using algebra, trig., etc..

By contrast, we often prefix calculus with the definite article, "the". For instance, "solve via the calculus".

Can anyone explain this exception to the rule?

Thanks in Advance.

Rich B.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nikkor180 said:
In English grammar, we typically refer to specific branches of mathematics without a prefixed article; e.g., solve using algebra, trig., etc..

By contrast, we often prefix calculus with the definite article, "the". For instance, "solve via the calculus".

Can anyone explain this exception to the rule?

Thanks in Advance.

Rich B.

Hi Rich,

Welcome to MHB! :)

I don't recall reading or hearing calculus used with the definite article "the". This would sound strange to me. Can you find an example of this usage? When I search this exact phrase on Google I get a relatively small number of results compared to just "calculus".
 
I will typically precede the word "calculus" with the article "the" primarily because some of the books I read during my formative years learning about mathematics did so. I cannot tell you why this is done, and not with other branches of elementary mathematics. :)
 
The word "calculus" literally means "pebble" or "stone" (from the same root as calcium, and ultimately, chalk), it is still used with this meaning in medicine. Originally, these calculi were used for counting (or in more sophisticated form, in an abacus). Thus calculus came to take on the meaning of the counting operations one performs in arithmetic.

Thus "a calculus" was a systemic way of performing calculations. The official name of what is now (as a math subject) called calculus, was: The Differential and Integral Calculus. This was shortened to "the calculus" as a way of distinguishing it from other calculi, for example synthetic division of polynomials. Although initial resistance to *this* calculus was high, it soon gained central prominence because of its wide application to problems involving force and motion, basically laying the technical groundwork for the machinery that fueled the industrial revolution. Physics, in particular, grew by leaps and bounds as this new tool was aggressively applied to many long-standing problems in mechanics, astronomy, optics, thermodynamics, and electricity and magnetism.

As is human tendency, the shortened form stuck, with the longer formal name implied thereby. For quite a long time, it stood as what was considered the pinnacle of human mathematical achievement, a sign that perhaps we really would one day unlock all the secrets of the universe (humans tend to do this, too- we really believe "we're all that"). As other calculi faded into obscurity (algebra was regarded for a long time as just a pedestrian calculation tool, something to master only so one could use it in service to "the calculus"), the "the" was also dropped, and "the calculus" simply became "calculus", or even just "calc" (such as in: "I failed calc this semester, the prof was a toad.").

By contrast, other branches of mathematics are often regarded as "methods" (the word "algebra" originally *meant* method, or reckoning, a cognate of the word "algorithm" used in computer science). So we have several "flavors" of algebra, or topology, or even geometry, none of which is distinguished enough from the rest to be called "the" (except, sometimes, in the sense of "the usual").

So "the calculus" becomes a somewhat archaic usage in today's parlance, although still used, because it really did usher in a revolutionary role for mathematics: not as something used to investigate knowledge, but as something which might serve as the basis for knowledge itself: mathematical proofs are regarded (even by laymen) as some of the more indisputable methods of demonstration available to human reasoning. There are those who believe, rather ardently, that the structure of everything we see has a mathematical basis (which we may, or may not, be able to decipher).
 
Deveno: Thank you so much for responding to my post. That was quite a nice dissertation!

Best wishes,

Rich
 
Back
Top