Why Do Wind Power Turbines Have Fewer Blades Than Hydro Power Turbines?

  • Thread starter Thread starter scorpio_wan1945
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Design Turbine
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differences in the number of blades between wind power turbines and hydro power turbines. Participants explore the reasons behind these differences, considering factors such as fluid density and energy transfer dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the difference in the number of blades is due to the density of the fluid.
  • Another participant suggests that the density of water (about 833 times that of air) and the speed of flow affect momentum and energy transfer, influencing turbine design.
  • It is proposed that water turbines are more rigid due to the shear forces from rushing water.
  • A claim is made that wind turbines are optimized for blade radius, and adding more blades may not provide significant advantages due to increased mass.
  • Participants note that wind turbines have a cut-out speed of around 65 mph, while water turbines may operate at higher flow rates.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints regarding the factors influencing turbine design, and no consensus is reached on the primary reasons for the differences in blade numbers.

Contextual Notes

Discussion includes assumptions about fluid dynamics and turbine efficiency, but these are not fully resolved or quantified.

scorpio_wan1945
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
hello,

there is a question bugging my head for quite some time..

why wind power plant has lesser turbine blades while the one in hydro power plant has more?...

is it due to the density of the fluid?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is probably a function of density (water has a density about 833 times that of air), speed of the flow both of which affect momentum and energy transfer. Water turbines are much more rigid because of the shear forces associated with the rushing water.

I believe wind turbines are optimized on radius (length) of the blades. Adding one more blade would increase the mass by another 33%, perhaps without added advantage.

The wind turbines cut out at around 65 mph (~97 ft/s), and I believe water turbine may have higher flows.
 
That seemed like an interesting question to me. Here's something off the net:

http://www.windpower.org/en/tour/design/index.htm

http://www.windpower.org/en/tour/design/concepts.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks for the explanation... and the links proves very useful :)
 
Some examples of hydro turbines:

http://www.voithsiemens.com/vs_e_prfmc_pwrful_prdcts_turbines.htm

http://www.toshiba.co.jp/f-ene/hydro/english/products/equipment/turbine.htm

http://www.hitachi.us/Apps/hitachicom/content.jsp?page=powerequipment/TurnkeyPowerPlants/HydroPlants/index.html&level=2&section=powerequipment&parent=TurnkeyPowerPlants&nav=left&path=jsp/hitachi/forbus/powerequipmentsystems/&nId=iD

http://www.gepower.com/prod_serv/products/hydro/en/turbines/index.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K