cnh1995 said:
But here, all parameters seem to be interdependent, so I don't know how the balance is established..I've made a huge mess..
Have you tried algebra?
The check on our mental process is to apply math and see if our mental model leads to an impossible conclusion.
The two simple equations for DC motor behavior are
(Counter-)EMF = K Φ RPM
T
(orque) = 7.04 K Φ I
a(rmature)
Let's try to get a single formula relating EMF, speed and torque.
________________________________________________________________________
T
(orque) = 7.04 K Φ I
a(rmature)
and for a
series machine Φ is a pretty linear function of I
a
so lump the constants
T =7.04 k' I
a2
I
a =
√(T/(7.04 k')
EMF = K Φ RPM
again Φ = k' I
a
EMF = k' I
a RPM
RPM = EMF/(k' I
a)
RPM = EMF / √(T/(7.04 k')
... lump some constants to make it look nicer and we have>> ta daaa--- (drum roll icon)
RPM = k'' EMF/√T
aha speed and torque have an inverse relationship as we'd expect
So - pick an applied voltage and a torque and you know RPM
what's limit of that as T
orque approaches zero ?
Speed of course won't make it to infinity the motor will fly apart as in that photo.That's why you noticed as a kid that Mom's vacuum cleaner motor speeds up when you put your hand over the suction port.
And it's why the vacuum cleaner motor has its impeller connected right to the shaft.
Old Chrysler automobile starters, which are series machines, had a small shunt field to prevent their self-destruction should the Bendix gear fail to engage.
So -
your mental model(if i understood you correctly) leads to a conclusion that agrees with multiple observations of real world phenomena.
Had it predicted instead the motor slows down under reduced torque we'd have to figure out why.
You should continue testing it in your leisure time.
But the truth is , you knew that all the time .
Have more faith ! Much of learning is discovering what we already know.
lastly - Please check my arithmetic - my "Senior Moments" are becoming laughably commonplace.