Why Does a Straw Retain Liquid? - Gordon

  • Thread starter Thread starter escapistgoat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water
AI Thread Summary
A blocked straw retains liquid due to the cohesion of the liquid, which prevents air from entering and displacing it. In contrast, an upside-down bottle releases liquid because air can easily replace the liquid as it exits. The size of the straw's opening and the surface tension of the liquid are critical factors in this phenomenon. Experiments with different straw diameters and liquids, such as salty water, confirmed that increasing surface tension requires a larger opening for air to bubble through. The findings support the initial theory regarding liquid retention in straws.
escapistgoat
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Why is it that a straw with it's top blocked off retains a liquid while an upside down bottle will release it?

Is it because the cohesion of the liquid in an area so small will prevent air from passing up through the liquid and replacing it within the straw?

If this is the case I intend to experiment with straws of various diameters and water with different surface tensions (by adding soap, salt or altering it's temperature.)

Thanks very much for any time you can spend helping me understand this.

-Gordon (is part of a complete breakfast)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. The size of the mouth and the surface tension of the fluid are determining factors.

If you increase the surface tension (say, but subbing corn syrup for water) you'll need a correspondingly larger mouth before it will be able to bubble.
 
Well I assembled an airtight and almost completely vibrationless apparatus to test this theory (small brass nozzle mounted into the lid of a large upturned glass jar which I sat atop a drinking glass on a concrete slab.)
Then I added salty water to my jar-'straw', which didn't seem to have any effect. So I slowly warmed the water and it began to blurp-blup out.
In conclusion; theory supported, thanks very much Dave!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top