Why does air travel faster over a wing?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kidsmoker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Airplane Lift
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the question of why air travels faster over a wing compared to underneath it, exploring various models and explanations related to aerodynamics and lift generation. Participants examine misconceptions and alternative viewpoints regarding the mechanics of wing design and airflow.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the common explanation that air travels faster over a wing because it has farther to travel, expressing skepticism about the validity of this model.
  • Another participant asserts that the traditional model is incorrect and suggests that many scientists and engineers mistakenly support it.
  • A participant provides examples of lifting bodies with different shapes to challenge the conventional understanding of wing aerodynamics.
  • It is proposed that wings generate lift by applying a downward force on the air, which in turn creates an upward force on the wing, referencing Newton's third law of motion.
  • Discussion includes the idea that the air above a wing is displaced further behind than the air below, and that the acceleration of air is primarily downward, contributing to lift.
  • There is mention of the relationship between forward speed, angle of attack, and how wings deflect air downward, leading to changes in kinetic and pressure energy.
  • One participant notes that while the increase in kinetic energy of the air is significant, it is partially offset by a decrease in pressure energy, indicating a complex interaction rather than a simple Bernoulli effect.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the traditional explanations of wing aerodynamics, with no consensus reached on a singular model or understanding of the phenomenon.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about airflow behavior and the efficiency of wings remain unaddressed, and the discussion reflects a variety of interpretations and models without resolving the underlying complexities.

kidsmoker
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I was just wondering why the air going over a wing travels faster than the air going underneath? My teacher once said "because it has farther to travel" and I just accepted that at the time, but thinking about it now i don't really see why two adjacent air molecules that part company at the front of the wing should neccessarily meet up again on the opposite side. Is there a better explanation?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well done for questioning it !
That model for how a wing works is wrong - but is believed by a large number of scientists and engineers who should know better.

This has a good explanation of a numberof the models: http://science.howstuffworks.com/airplane5.htm
 
Last edited:
If you're still in contact with your teacher, show him these pictures and ask how these pre-shuttle lifting bodies with flat tops and curved bottoms fly?

m2-f2 glider version:
m2-f2.jpg

m2-f3 rocket powered version (max speed mach 1.6):
m2-f3.jpg

Wings produce lift by applying a downwards force on the air, which responds with an equal and upwards force on the wing, following Netwons 3rd law of motion. The downwards force results in a downwards acceleration of air, and the air's reaction to this downwards acceleration is an upwards force on the wing.

You're correct in that equal transit time is wrong. With a conventional wing, the air above ends up displaced further behind the wing than the air below, but note that most of the acceleration and motion of the air is downwards (corresponding to lift), with only a small amount forwards (corresponding to drag).

How wings accelerate air downwards is a combination of foward speed and effective angle of attack (air is "deflected" downwards). The final result is a significant increase in kinetic energy of the air (1/2 m v2), which would normally require a lot of work done on the air, but most of this increase in kinetic energy is offset with a decrease in pressure energy, in a Bernoulli like transition. Wing's aren't 100% efficient, so there is some work done on the air and not all of the transition is Bernoulli like.
 
Cool thanks for those. I've read the explanation on howstuffworks and i understand it better now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
12K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
32K