Why Does Alpha & Beta Particle Emission Occur in Radioactive Nuclei?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ksac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Alpha Beta
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the mechanisms of radioactive decay, specifically focusing on why alpha and beta particle emissions are prevalent in radioactive nuclei. Participants explore the nature of these emissions, the conditions under which they occur, and the potential for other types of emissions, such as neutron emission and cluster decay.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why radioactive nuclei predominantly emit alpha and beta particles, rather than other combinations of nucleons.
  • Cluster decay is mentioned as a rare type of nuclear decay that involves the emission of a heavier cluster than an alpha particle, occurring mainly in heavy atoms.
  • Beta decay is described as a weak-force process that differs from alpha decay, which involves the emission of a stable alpha particle.
  • Participants note that in hot nuclei, proton and neutron emissions can occur, but spontaneous neutron emission is not observed in cold nuclei due to the absence of a Coulomb barrier.
  • The stability of the alpha particle is highlighted, with some arguing that its doubly magic nature contributes to its favored emission in alpha decay.
  • Preformation of alpha particles within the nucleus is discussed as a factor influencing alpha decay rates, though the exact probability of this preformation is uncertain.
  • Electron capture is mentioned as a process where a proton is converted into a neutron, affecting the nucleus without emitting a particle.
  • Neutron emission is noted as possible under specific conditions, such as interaction with gamma rays, but is generally less common than alpha and beta emissions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the mechanisms of decay, with no consensus reached on the reasons for the predominance of alpha and beta emissions. Multiple competing explanations and models are presented, indicating an unresolved discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about decay mechanisms depend on specific conditions or assumptions, such as the energy state of the nucleus or the presence of external interactions like gamma rays. The discussion includes references to various decay processes without resolving the complexities involved.

ksac
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Do we know why radioactive nuclei only decay through emission of alpha and beta particles? There is spontaneous fission in some cases, of course, but what I mean to ask is, why should just a proton or just a neutron or a particle X with 2 protons and 3 neutrons, or whatever else not be emitted? Why does this particular combination of 2 and 2 in alpha particle work as against any other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cluster decay

Hi ksac! :smile:

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cluster_decay" …
Cluster decay is a type of nuclear decay in which a radioactive atom emits a cluster of neutrons and protons heavier than an alpha particle. This type of decay happens only in nuclides which decay predominatly by alpha decay, and occurs only a small percentage of the time in all cases. Cluster decay is limited to heavy atoms which have enough nuclear energy to expel a portion of its nucleus.

Cluster decay has an intermediate position between alpha decay (in which a nucleus spits out a 4He nucleus) and spontaneous fission …

… see the full article for more details. :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ksac said:
Do we know why radioactive nuclei only decay through emission of alpha and beta particles? There is spontaneous fission in some cases, of course, but what I mean to ask is, why should just a proton or just a neutron or a particle X with 2 protons and 3 neutrons, or whatever else not be emitted? Why does this particular combination of 2 and 2 in alpha particle work as against any other?
The alpha particle is a pretty stable collection of nucleons.

Radionuclei also experience electron capture in which a K-electron (and possibly L-electron) will be capture by the nucleus and a proton will be transformed into a neutron. It has the same effect as positron emission, in which Z decreases by 1 with A (integer) remaining the same.

Also, some of the transuranics undergo spontaneous fission.
 
ksac said:
Do we know why radioactive nuclei only decay through emission of alpha and beta particles? There is spontaneous fission in some cases, of course, but what I mean to ask is, why should just a proton or just a neutron or a particle X with 2 protons and 3 neutrons, or whatever else not be emitted? Why does this particular combination of 2 and 2 in alpha particle work as against any other?

Beta decay is qualitatively different from alpha decay. It's a weak-force process, and it doesn't involve emission of a particle or cluster of particles that were already present inside the parent nucleus.

Tiny-tim has pointed out that other types of particle emission do occur. Another thing to realize is that in a hot nucleus (e.g., a nucleus that's just been created via fusion reactions in an accelerator), you do get lots of proton and neutron emission.

The reason you'll never see spontaneous neutron emission in a cold nucleus is that there's no Coulomb barrier to tunnel through. Therefore any neutron that has enough energy to escape will do so immediately, not after a longer time delay as with charged particles.

The main reason that alpha decay tends to be favored is that the alpha is a doubly magic nucleus, so it has an extremely large binding energy. That means that by phase space arguments, alpha emission is strongly favored.

Another issue is the somewhat foggy notion of "preformation." A straightforward way of estimating alpha decay rates is as follows. You calculate the probability P of tunneling out through the coulomb barrier. You estimate the frequency f with which an alpha particle assaults the barrier, which is basically found by taking the velocity scale (1% of the speed of light) and dividing by the distance scale (a few fm). Then 1/(Pf) gives an estimate of the alpha decay half-life. This estimate has all the right behavior as a function of A and Z, but it's much too short by some large, constant factor. To account for this you assume that there's only some small probability that neutrons and protons will already have gotten together and formed themselves into an alpha particle. This preformation probability is difficult to calculate, but it makes sense that it's higher for alphas than for other clusters. This is because (a) an alpha is small (only 4 particles), (b) the nuclear residual interaction includes a strong pairing force, which sort of favors the formation of nn and pp correlations, and (c) the binding energy of an alpha is very favorable. This is really just a plausibility argument. Formally, you really can't have an alpha particle cruising around inside a nucleus, because of the Pauli exclusion principle. However, nucleon-nucleon correlations inside nuclei do exist.
 
bcrowell said:
The reason you'll never see spontaneous neutron emission in a cold nucleus is that there's no Coulomb barrier to tunnel through. Therefore any neutron that has enough energy to escape will do so immediately, not after a longer time delay as with charged particles.
Sometimes a radioactive nucleus will emit a neutron along with an antineutrino. This the process called K-capture (where an orbital electron and a proton convert to a neutron) discussed by Astronuc above.
Bob S
 
Bob S said:
Sometimes a radioactive nucleus will emit a neutron along with an antineutrino. This the process called K-capture (where an orbital electron and a proton convert to a neutron) discussed by Astronuc above.
Bob S
Careful - In electron capture, the neutron stays in the nucleus. Neutron emission may happen when a gamma ray of sufficient energy interacts with the nucleus - a process known a photo-neutron emission - or photodisintegration in the case of a deuteron (d (γ,n) p).

One can also look at the requirement for various decay schemes - looking at the masses of the nuclei before and after the reaction with E or ΔE = Δm c2 to see if E or ΔE is > 0 (exothermic, preferred) or < 0 (endothermic, not spontaneous, but requires energy input).
 
Astronuc said:
Careful - In electron capture, the neutron stays in the nucleus. Neutron emission may happen when a gamma ray of sufficient energy interacts with the nucleus - a process known a photo-neutron emission - or photodisintegration in the case of a deuteron (d (γ,n) p)..
My bad Sorry Bob S
 
I forgot to mention two neutron-emitting radioactive sources I used as a grad student: Plubyllium (symbol PuBe), and Pobyllium (symbol PoBe). I don't know what the plutonium polonium beryllium mixture ratios were. Lots of neutrons, but the alphas were fully contained.
Bob S
[added] Read the abstract of
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1955PhRv...98..740S
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K