Why does an electron not stick to the nucleus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter icecubebeast
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Nucleus
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion addresses why electrons do not collapse into the nucleus despite their negative charge and the nucleus's positive charge. The outdated Bohr model, which depicted electrons as orbiting like planets, is contrasted with the current quantum mechanical model that describes electron positions probabilistically rather than through defined trajectories. The uncertainty principle plays a crucial role, as confining an electron to the nucleus would lead to high kinetic energy, prompting the atom to favor a state with greater uncertainty in position and lower energy. Additionally, there is a small probability of electrons being found within the nucleus, which can lead to phenomena such as electron capture in certain isotopes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Understanding of the uncertainty principle
  • Basic atomic structure knowledge
  • Familiarity with electron capture and nuclear decay
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the quantum mechanical model of the atom in detail
  • Research electron capture and its role in nuclear decay
  • Examine advanced topics in quantum field theory related to particle interactions
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching atomic theory, and researchers interested in quantum mechanics and atomic interactions.

icecubebeast
Messages
66
Reaction score
3
If the electrons are negative charged and nucleus is positively charged, then why do electrons still orbit around the nucleus at a distance and not just stick to the nucleus?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Bohr atom and little tiny charged marbles "orbiting" one another like a miniature solar system is NOT a reflection of what is actually happening; it WAS a model that was used well over a century ago to investigate certain initial hypotheses of the mechanics of very small systems. The current quantum mechanical model of interactions of electrons with atomic nuclei gives you ONLY the probability of finding an electron at a certain distance "r" in a certain direction θ, φ from the nucleus. It does not describe an orbital trajectory.
 
Bystander said:
The Bohr atom and little tiny charged marbles "orbiting" one another like a miniature solar system is NOT a reflection of what is actually happening; it WAS a model that was used well over a century ago to investigate certain initial hypotheses of the mechanics of very small systems. The current quantum mechanical model of interactions of electrons with atomic nuclei gives you ONLY the probability of finding an electron at a certain distance "r" in a certain direction θ, φ from the nucleus. It does not describe an orbital trajectory.
But why does the electron stay at a distance away from the nucleus instead of sticking?
 
icecubebeast said:
But why does the electron stay at a distance away from the nucleus instead of sticking?
It is due to the uncertainty principle. If the electron is stuck to the nucleus then the uncertainty in its position is very small so the uncertainty in its momentum is very large. This in turn means that the average kinetic energy is high. Since an atom likes to be in a low-energy state it will give off energy to go to a state where the position is more uncertain and the momentum less uncertain.
 
  • Like
Likes icecubebeast
Bystander said:
The current quantum mechanical model of interactions of electrons with atomic nuclei gives you ONLY the probability of finding an electron at a certain distance "r" in a certain direction θ, φ from the nucleus.

In fact, an atomic electron generally does have a small probability of being located inside the nucleus (very small distance r from the center of the atom/nucleus). In certain isotopes, this produces a type of nuclear decay called electron capture.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_capture
 
icecubebeast said:
If the electrons are negative charged and nucleus is positively charged, then why do electrons still orbit around the nucleus at a distance and not just stick to the nucleus?

This is a good time to introduce to you, if you haven't discover it already, the https://www.physicsforums.com/forums/physics-faq.209/ , and https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/why-dont-electrons-crash-into-the-nucleus-in-atoms.511179/ in particular.

Zz.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Colors in a plasma globe'
I have a common plasma globe with blue streamers and orange pads at both ends. The orange light is emitted by neon and the blue light is presumably emitted by argon and xenon. Why are the streamers blue while the pads at both ends are orange? A plasma globe's electric field is strong near the central electrode, decreasing with distance, so I would not expect the orange color at both ends.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
699
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K