Why Does Calculating Maximum Height in Hooke's Law Give a Negative Value?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jon1NL8796
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hooke's law Law
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum height a mass rises when released from a spring, utilizing Hooke's Law and energy conservation principles. The user initially miscalculated the height, yielding a negative value due to incorrect application of energy equations. The correct approach involves equating the potential energy of the spring (PE elastic) to gravitational potential energy (PEg), leading to a maximum height of 1.98 meters when a 150-gram mass is attached to a spring with a spring constant of 69.51 N/m. The final calculations confirm that energy is conserved in a frictionless environment.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and spring constants
  • Knowledge of potential energy (PE) and kinetic energy (KE) equations
  • Familiarity with energy conservation principles in physics
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Hooke's Law in various contexts
  • Learn about energy conservation in mechanical systems
  • Explore the concepts of potential energy and kinetic energy in depth
  • Investigate real-world applications of springs and oscillatory motion
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to energy conservation and Hooke's Law.

Jon1NL8796
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey there everyone. First post, so... yeah.

Anywho, I got a few questions on Hooke's law as a homework assignment. But the last one is giving me some trouble. I'll tell what I've done so far that leads up to the problem.

The first question asks to calculate the work done given a Graphical Analysis graph that has force on the y-axis and the elongation of a spring on the x-axis (N/m). I figured out that this would be equal to the area of under the given best fit line, so it was a simple case of using the equation K=(.5)bh, where b is th longest elongation (.084) and h is the corresponding force (5.886). So the equation looks like:

Work = K = (.5)(.084)(5.886)
= .247 J

The next question is to find the maximum speed of the spring when a 150 gram mass is attatched to the end, the spring is stretched to its maximum distance, and then released. I know this dealt with PE elastic and KE. so the equation was:

PE elastic(i) + KE(i) = PE elastic(f) + KE(f)

And since there was no KE initially or PE elastic in the final effect:

PE elastic = KE

So then:

PE elastic = (0.5)kx^2
= (0.5)(69.51)(0.084)^2
= 0.245 J
PE elastic = KE = (0.5)mV^2
0.245 = (0.5)(0.15)V^2
V^2 = 0.245 / ([0.5][0.15])
= 3.27
V = 1.81 m/s

Now here's the final question, which is giving me so much trouble. If the setup from the previous question is rigged to be released vertically at the instant that all of the PE in the spring is transferred to the mass, what will the maximum height the mass rises to be?

I thought that since it involved PEg, PE elastic, and KE, and because there would initially be no KE or PEg or PE elastic in the final result, the equation would look like:

(.5)kx^2 = (.5)mV^2 + mgh

Yet no matter how many times I try to get it to work, I always get h to equal a negative number in the ten-thousanths place. I need help with this desperately, and any assistance given would be greatly appreciated.

Peace out y'all!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Initial (at bottom, call h=0):
KE = 0 (not moving)
PEg =0 (h=0)
PEelast=max (x is maximum and equal to h)

Final (at top):
KE=0 (not moving)
PEg =maximum
PEelast= 0 (you can set the "x" to an arbitrary 0, just like "h")

NOw you assume that the total energy of the system remaons constant, and is still equal to what it was before. How much energy was there?
 
Last edited:
Thanks for that, I see how I went wrong and fixed the problem.

The questions are supposed to take place in a frictionless enviorment, so there would be no energy loss between the initial and the final. And seeing as the new equation is PE elastic = PEg, and I had already found PE elastic to be .245 J, PEg would be equal to .245 J.

So the steps for the final question looked like this:

.245 = PEg = mgh
= (.15)(9.81)h
h = .245 / ([.15][9.81])
= 1.98 m

Thanks again Chi!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
44
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K