Why Does Crystal Violet Show Different Reaction Orders at Different Wavelengths?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Soaring Crane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Crystal
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The reaction order of Crystal Violet (CV) with NaOH varies significantly with wavelength, demonstrating first-order kinetics at 526 nm and zero-order kinetics at 590 nm. Graphical analysis using a colorimeter revealed that the best fit for absorbance versus time was achieved at 526 nm, contradicting the expected first-order reaction at the lambda_max of 590 nm. This discrepancy is attributed to the absorbance levels and potential deviations from Beer’s Law at higher absorbance values. Proper preparation of the CV solution is crucial for accurate quantitative analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of reaction kinetics, specifically first-order and zero-order reactions.
  • Familiarity with colorimetric analysis and the use of colorimeters.
  • Knowledge of Beer’s Law and its implications on absorbance measurements.
  • Experience with graphical data analysis techniques.
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the principles of colorimetric analysis and the role of lambda_max in reaction kinetics.
  • Learn about the preparation and dilution techniques for chemical solutions to ensure accurate absorbance readings.
  • Study the implications of absorbance levels on Beer’s Law and how to mitigate deviations.
  • Explore advanced graphical analysis methods for interpreting kinetic data from colorimetric experiments.
USEFUL FOR

Chemists, laboratory technicians, and students involved in analytical chemistry, particularly those focusing on reaction kinetics and colorimetric methods.

Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
In the reaction of CV with NaOH, the order of CV is 1 (first order). However, in an experiment that I did with a colorimeter, I did not entirely come up with this value. Graphical analysis was done to determine the best wavelength from the absorption spectrum and lambda_max = 590 nm.
After looking at the absorbance readings (or manipulations of A in relation to each order) vs. time at 0 order through 2nd order at 590 nm, it was concluded that 0 order (A vs t) gave the best line; this does not match the true value.

On the other hand, at 526 nm, which had a lower absorbance level than 590 nm, absorbance readings (and its manifestations) vs. time had the best line at first order (ln A vs t) than 0 and 2nd orders. Exactly why is the true value (first order) available at 526 nm but not at the lambda_max 590 nm?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
In general, for quantitative analysis, it's better to pick a broad and smooth region for the absorbance and one between .5-1 abs units, at higher abs several things contribute to deviancy from beer's law. What was the respective absorbance values for the two wavelengths, what did the graphs look like? It may be that if you had analyzed the spectrum at a wavelength peak with high absorbance, such as due to inadequate dilution, the trend in the dynamic range may not be dependable. What instrument are you using?
 
Actually, I just found out that the CV preparation was not that great.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
40K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
9K