zimsam
- 3
- 0
The discussion revolves around the mathematical reasoning behind why the derivative $\frac{dy}{dt}$ equals zero at the endpoint of the minor axis of a given equation, specifically $(x-1)^2 + 2y^2 = 2$. Participants explore the implications of this result in the context of implicit differentiation and the behavior of the variables involved.
Participants express differing views on the implications of $\frac{dy}{dt}$ being zero. While some acknowledge that this is a valid outcome at the endpoint, others contest the interpretation of what this means for the behavior of $y$ over time.
There are unresolved questions regarding the assumptions made during implicit differentiation and the specific conditions under which $\frac{dy}{dt}$ is evaluated. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the implications of the mathematical results presented.
skeeter said:(a) $\dfrac{d}{dt}\bigg[(x-1)^2+ 2y^2=2 \bigg]$
you are given $\dfrac{dx}{dt}$ and the position of the planet.
use the derivative to calculate $\dfrac{dy}{dt}$
(b) hint …
$\theta = \arctan\left(\dfrac{y}{x}\right)$
skeeter said:
zimsam said:I already know that dy/dt must be changing as well...
How did I make a mistake in my implicit differentiation?