Why does e^{-0.5} equal \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n}{n!}(0.5)^n?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nhrock3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error Exponent
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculation of e^{-0.5} and its representation as a Taylor series. It clarifies that the Taylor series for e^{-x} leads to the expression e^{-0.5} = ∑_{n=0}^∞ (-1)^n/n!(0.5)^n. Participants debate the methods of developing the series and confirm that both approaches yield the same result despite initial confusion. The key point is that the Taylor series for e^{-x} and e^{x} differ in their signs, but the series for e^{-0.5} is correctly derived. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the equivalence of the two series representations.
nhrock3
Messages
403
Reaction score
0
i need to calculate e^{-0.5}

why the solution develops e^{-x} and puts 0.5
and not e^{+x} and putting -0.5
?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have no idea what you are talking about. What do you mean by "develops e^{-x}? Writing as a Taylor's series? Approximating by the tangent line?

I suspect that both them method your book gives and your method would give the same answer. Have you tried it?
 
yes developing in taylor series
but in the first we have libnits series and on the other not
so its not the same

why they are not the same?
 
If f(x)= e^{-x} then f(0)= 1, f'= -e^{-x} so f'(0)= -1, f"(0)= e^{-x} so f"(0)= 1, etc. The "nth" derivative, evaluated at x= 0, is 1 if n is even, -1 if n is odd. The Taylor's series, about x= 0, for e^{-x} is
\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n}{n!}x^n[/itex].<br /> <br /> In particular, <br /> e^{-0.5}= \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n}{n!}(0.5)^n[/itex]&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; The usual Taylor&amp;#039;s series for e^x is, of course, &lt;br /&gt; \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{1}{n!}x^n[/itex] &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; and now&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; e^{-0.5)= \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{1}{n!}(-0.5)^n= \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{1}{n!}(-1)^n(0.5)^n&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n}{n!}(0.5)^n&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; They are exactly the same.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K