Why does e^{-0.5} equal \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n}{n!}(0.5)^n?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nhrock3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Error Exponent
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical expression for calculating \( e^{-0.5} \) and its representation as a Taylor series. Participants are exploring the relationship between the exponential function and its series expansion.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions why \( e^{-x} \) is developed with \( 0.5 \) instead of using \( e^{+x} \) with \( -0.5 \). Other participants discuss the Taylor series representation and the differences between the series for \( e^{-x} \) and \( e^{x} \).

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the Taylor series for \( e^{-x} \) and how it leads to the expression for \( e^{-0.5} \). There is an ongoing exploration of the equivalence of different series representations, but no consensus has been reached on the original poster's question.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the nuances of Taylor series and the implications of using different forms of the exponential function. There may be assumptions about familiarity with series expansions and derivatives that are not explicitly stated.

nhrock3
Messages
403
Reaction score
0
i need to calculate [tex]e^{-0.5}[/tex]

why the solution develops [tex]e^{-x}[/tex] and puts 0.5
and not [tex]e^{+x}[/tex] and putting -0.5
?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have no idea what you are talking about. What do you mean by "develops [itex]e^{-x}[/itex]? Writing as a Taylor's series? Approximating by the tangent line?

I suspect that both them method your book gives and your method would give the same answer. Have you tried it?
 
yes developing in taylor series
but in the first we have libnits series and on the other not
so its not the same

why they are not the same?
 
If [itex]f(x)= e^{-x}[/itex] then f(0)= 1, [itex]f'= -e^{-x}[/itex] so f'(0)= -1, [itex]f"(0)= e^{-x}[/itex] so f"(0)= 1, etc. The "nth" derivative, evaluated at x= 0, is 1 if n is even, -1 if n is odd. The Taylor's series, about x= 0, for [itex]e^{-x}[/itex] is
[tex]\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n}{n!}x^n[/itex].<br /> <br /> In particular, <br /> [tex]e^{-0.5}= \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n}{n!}(0.5)^n[/itex]<br /> <br /> The usual Taylor's series for [itex]e^x[/itex] is, of course, <br /> [tex]\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{1}{n!}x^n[/itex] <br /> <br /> and now<br /> [tex]e^{-0.5)= \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{1}{n!}(-0.5)^n= \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{1}{n!}(-1)^n(0.5)^n[/tex]<br /> [tex]= \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n}{n!}(0.5)^n[/tex]<br /> <br /> They are exactly the same.[/tex][/tex][/tex]
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K