Why does everything achieves to reach equilibrium?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Skhandelwal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Systems in nature inherently strive to achieve equilibrium, defined as a state of minimum total energy. This principle aligns with the second law of thermodynamics, which states that entropy tends to increase, leading to a greater number of accessible states within a system. The discussion emphasizes that while energy is conserved, the movement towards equilibrium is a natural tendency of systems, resulting in a balance of energy distribution. The conversation also touches on the complexities of defining and understanding entropy within the context of quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the second law of thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with concepts of energy conservation
  • Basic knowledge of statistical thermodynamics
  • Awareness of quantum mechanics principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the second law of thermodynamics on physical systems
  • Explore the concept of entropy and its mathematical representation in statistical mechanics
  • Study the relationship between energy distribution and equilibrium in thermodynamic systems
  • Investigate quantum mechanics and its effects on system behavior and entropy
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, thermodynamics, and quantum mechanics, as well as anyone interested in understanding the principles of energy, entropy, and equilibrium in natural systems.

Skhandelwal
Messages
400
Reaction score
3
I don't get this...Why does everything tries to move to settle equilibrium? I thought, to move, you need energy. Or is it like everything is compressed and setting up equilibrium is bassically being released from the compression?

Thx.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Systems in nature like to reach states of minimum total energy. This thing we call equilibrium is the name for a state of minimum energy.

EDIT: I just realized that I was posting in another thread with both of you. Deja Vu!:smile:
 
Last edited:
G01 said:
Systems in nature like to reach states of minimum total energy. This thing we call equilibrium is the name for a state of minimum energy.

GO1 saves the day again! yea it is the same theroy
 
G01 said:
Systems in nature like to reach states of minimum total energy. This thing we call equilibrium is the name for a state of minimum energy.

OK... but energy is convserved, yes? So if one system reaches a state of miimum total energy, some other system increases its energy...

I know what you mean, GO1 - but I'm just feeling in a nit-picking mood as to whether this "explains" why things are the way they are.

Most mainstream physics doesn't even attempt to explain "why" - it stops at describing "what".
 
G01 said:
Systems in nature like to reach states of minimum total energy. This thing we call equilibrium is the name for a state of minimum energy.

EDIT: I just realized that I was posting in another thread with both of you. Deja Vu!:smile:

But that doesn't say WHY the "like to reach states of minimum total energy"!

Look at the definition of "equilibrium" (of any kind). When something is in equilibrium, it, by definition, stays there. If it is not in equilibrium, it keeps "moving". Sooner or later it will, perhaps entirely by chance, hit an equilibrium and stay there. Eventually, everything will have stumbled upon an equilibrium.
 
AlephZero said:
OK... but energy is convserved, yes? So if one system reaches a state of miimum total energy, some other system increases its energy...

I know what you mean, GO1 - but I'm just feeling in a nit-picking mood as to whether this "explains" why things are the way they are.

Most mainstream physics doesn't even attempt to explain "why" - it stops at describing "what".

HallsofIvy said:
But that doesn't say WHY the "like to reach states of minimum total energy"!

Look at the definition of "equilibrium" (of any kind). When something is in equilibrium, it, by definition, stays there. If it is not in equilibrium, it keeps "moving". Sooner or later it will, perhaps entirely by chance, hit an equilibrium and stay there. Eventually, everything will have stumbled upon an equilibrium.

OK, what I said doesn't describe why systems tend to equilibrium, but I felt like trying anyway! I guess should have quit while I was on top.:smile:
 
According to the second law of thermodynamics, entropy (or disorder) tends to increase overall. In statistical thermodynamics, entropy is shown proportional to the logarithm of accessible states of the system. (By a particular state one might mean one of all possible arrangements of quantum numbers comprising a system at a given time.) These first two sentences are equivalent to saying that the number of states available in a system tends to increase.

If we had continually exact knowledge of a system, the entropy measured might appear not to change. However, quantum mechanics tells us that to participate in a system disturbs a system, generating randomness. It is a lot easier to view salt and pepper segregated in their respective shakers than separate them, mixed in a pile, by observation.
 
but, nothing that I know of is in 'true equilibrium'---you have to go into 'reference frames' to get close, I believe.
 
But why does the entropy increase? And what is entropy?(is it state of universe(increasing meaning it is expanding) and time?)
 
  • #10
Skhandelwal said:
But why does the entropy increase? And what is entropy?(is it state of universe(increasing meaning it is expanding) and time?)

Have you looked around the web for some explanations yet?

eg

http://www.entropylaw.com/
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K