Why does everything goes to equilibrium?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Skhandelwal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of equilibrium, emphasizing that systems naturally tend toward states of equilibrium where the total force is zero. It highlights that achieving equilibrium requires energy input to counteract forces that disrupt it. The conversation also notes that equilibrium represents a local minimum in energy, and systems will reach a balance when energy inputs equal energy losses. This understanding is crucial for comprehending various physical and chemical processes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly forces and energy.
  • Familiarity with the principles of thermodynamics.
  • Knowledge of equilibrium in chemical reactions.
  • Basic grasp of energy conservation laws.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the laws of thermodynamics and their relation to equilibrium.
  • Explore the concept of potential energy and its role in stability.
  • Study chemical equilibrium and Le Chatelier's principle.
  • Investigate the dynamics of systems in motion and their equilibrium states.
USEFUL FOR

Students in AP Physics or Chemistry, educators teaching equilibrium concepts, and anyone interested in the fundamental principles of energy and force in physical systems.

Skhandelwal
Messages
400
Reaction score
3
In everysingle thing in the world, everything tries to set up equilibrium, reaction b/w two objects, etc. But why? It is one of those questions that you never even think about. Like what causes charge. It is strange that now when I am taking AP classes, I have began to think about this simple concept. What causes equilibrium? I mean change always needs energy but this is one change that requires energy to stop it.
 
Science news on Phys.org
You got it the other way around; it's not that thing tend to go to places we declare to be equilibria, but instead, we observed where things like to go to and according to that declared them to be equilibria. Moreover, equilibria are states where the total force is zero. Hence, when something is not at an equilibrium, there will be a force to move it, so it won't stay there.
 
pseudovector said:
...Hence, when something is not at an equilibrium, there will be a force to move it, so it won't stay there.

Something can move at constant velocity and still be in equilibrium.
 
An equilibrium state implies a local minimum in the energy. It requires an addition of energy to the system to move it out of the equilibrium state. Thus things tend to seek an equilibrium as energy is lost to the environment and other factors. The system will finally reach a situation where the various energy inputs equal the various energy losses creating a equilibrium situation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
706
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
827
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
556
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K