L²Cc
- 149
- 0
do you have an explanation to why sometimes the general term formula for geometric sequence is not raised to n-1 but to simply n?
The discussion revolves around the general term formula for geometric sequences and the reasoning behind using \( n \) instead of \( n-1 \) in certain contexts.
Some participants have provided explanations regarding the use of \( n \) versus \( n-1 \) based on the starting index of the sequence. The conversation reflects an exploration of different interpretations and clarifications without reaching a definitive consensus.
There is an implicit assumption about the starting point of the geometric sequence, which influences the formulation of the general term. The discussion also touches on the notation used in summation, indicating a need for clarity on how these conventions are applied.