Why Does PΔV = nRΔT Hold True in Some Isobaric Processes but Not Others?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The equation PΔV = nRΔT holds true in isobaric processes when the internal pressure of the gas closely matches the external pressure during a quasi-static process. In such cases, the work done (W) can be expressed as W = PΔV, leading to the heat added (Q) being calculated as Q = ΔU + W = (3/2)nRΔT + PΔV, resulting in Q = (5/2)nRΔT. However, in rapid processes where internal and external pressures differ significantly, using internal pressure in calculations leads to inaccuracies, as W must be determined by the external pressure (W = PextΔV), which can be less than PintΔV.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the ideal gas law and its applications
  • Familiarity with the first law of thermodynamics
  • Knowledge of isobaric processes and their characteristics
  • Basic concepts of pressure, volume, and temperature relationships in thermodynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of quasi-static versus non-quasi-static processes in thermodynamics
  • Learn about the derivation and applications of the ideal gas law
  • Explore the concept of work done in thermodynamic processes, focusing on external versus internal pressures
  • Investigate the behavior of mono-atomic ideal gases under varying conditions of temperature and pressure
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and engineering, particularly those focusing on thermodynamics, heat transfer, and fluid mechanics.

dUDEonAfORUM
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
In a isobaric process W=PΔV
I
Given the change in temperature and pressure is constant to find heat added to an mono-atomic ideal gas we use
Q=ΔU + W = 3/2 nRΔT + PΔV = 3/2 nRΔT + nRΔT
so Q=5/2 nRΔT correct?
II
But given the heat added to an ideal gas, constant pressure that acts on the gas, and change in volume
To find ΔU we have to use ΔU = Q-W = Q-PΔV
and using ΔU = 3/2 PΔV (based on PΔV=nRΔT ) is incorrect I was told this is so because P in PΔV=nRΔT is the pressure of the ideal gas and not the pressure acting on the ideal gas, is this explanation true?So why does PΔV= nRΔT hold true in the I and not in II ?
 
Science news on Phys.org
dUDEonAfORUM said:
In a isobaric process W=PΔV
I
Given the change in temperature and pressure is constant to find heat added to an mono-atomic ideal gas we use
Q=ΔU + W = 3/2 nRΔT + PΔV = 3/2 nRΔT + nRΔT
so Q=5/2 nRΔT correct?
II
But given the heat added to an ideal gas, constant pressure that acts on the gas, and change in volume
To find ΔU we have to use ΔU = Q-W = Q-PΔV
and using ΔU = 3/2 PΔV (based on PΔV=nRΔT ) is incorrect I was told this is so because P in PΔV=nRΔT is the pressure of the ideal gas and not the pressure acting on the ideal gas, is this explanation true?So why does PΔV= nRΔT hold true in the I and not in II ?
The first law: Q = ΔU + W always holds when comparing two thermodynamic equilibrium states. But W is determined by the process between those two equilibrium states. If the process occurs (e.g. expansion) with the minimal difference between internal gas pressure and external pressure, the process will be quasi-static and the work done, W = PextΔV = PintΔV = nRΔT.

This would occur, for example, when slowly adding heat to a gas in a balloon. The addition of heat causes the gas pressure to increase slightly above external pressure but expansion quickly causes the internal pressure to decrease so it never gets significantly higher than external pressure.

But if you have a rapid process of expansion or compression the internal gas pressure and external gas pressure will not be the same during the process. In the case of a rapid expansion, the internal pressure will initially be significantly greater than the external pressure. The work done on the surroundings is determined by the external pressure x change in volume regardless of what the internal gas pressure is during the process. So W = PextΔV < PintΔV = nRΔT.

AM
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K