Why does spacetime warp around mass if it doesn't have mass?

In summary, strings may not have mass, but mass affects spacetime curvature. This is why matter affects spacetime.
  • #1
Natsirt
41
0
Whatever spacetime be made of strings or some other erotic substance it seems that it doesn't have mass so what causes it to warp around mass, shouldn't it pass right through?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
And who said it has to be some kind of matter to have mass? references?

Strings? hmmm
 
  • #3
Natsirt said:
Whatever spacetime be made of strings or some other erotic substance

I like it more this way, but your auto-correction software may have messed up what you're trying to say...
 
  • #4
I guess a more precise question would be why does mass effect mass even if it can sometimes pass through things like neutrinos do or maybe how the strings in String theory might?
 
  • #5
Natsirt said:
I guess a more precise question would be why does mass effect mass even if it can sometimes pass through things like neutrinos do or maybe how the strings in String theory might?

The bigger Mass warps spacetime and the other smaller mass will follow the geodesic. Neutrinos pass through matter because they don't feel the strong force and also don't have charge. (electromagnetic). But even Neutrinos cause spacetime curvature because they some mass ,therefore they "affect mass". But the effect can't be observed because it is very small.
 
  • #6
So why doesn't spacetime go through matter unaffected?
 
  • #7
Natsirt said:
So why doesn't spacetime go through matter unaffected?

Why should it? it is not matter.
It is space, certainly not matter, and time, which is definitely not matter. Space-time.

You should ask how matter affects space-time. Read up the Energy-momentum tensor. I will leave it to the rest of the members because I don't think I can answer that.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #8
Spacetime is like a forcefield that takes up volume, therefore if you bring a mass into it, the spacetime can't escape the universe so it is forced to curve arroundd the mass and apply a force to it
 
  • #9
That makes sense, thankyou
 
  • #10
Master Sashin said:
Spacetime is like a forcefield that takes up volume, therefore if you bring a mass into it, the spacetime can't escape the universe so it is forced to curve arroundd the mass and apply a force to it

Im only in grade 10 so i have little knowledge so maybe research a bit and tell me if I am right
 
  • #11
I'm in 10th too. Space-time does act like a force field, I knew that but I needed to hear it in the way you said it. Some of what we have been discussing is string theory and how the energy that makes the strings vibrate means they won't pass through things, instead they'll act as a force or a "force field" so your not wrong.
 
  • #12
Natsirt,

You seem to be trying to understand by physics by putting the words together in the right order. This, I am afraid, will not get you to where you want to be. Physics is inherently mathematical. People can give you verbal explanations, but they are at best approximate, and you will not be able to combine them and get something that is correct. Or even sometimes make sense.

PS Erotic materials are something other than what you wrote. :devil:
 
  • #13
In general I don't see why someone would try to imagine these things with strings and make his/her mind more confused over it. Especially when he/she doesn't have the appropriate basic knowledge on the field apart from maybe some scifi books.
We know that mass and energy are able to act as sources of gravity, because of the Einstein Equations of General Relativity. From the one side of your equations, you have the Einstein tensor which contains the information of your spacetime geometry. On the other side, you have the energy-momentum tensor which comes straightforward from the existence of matter and/or radiation. It's due to this that you actually have that mass,energy can interact with spacetime curvature (so spacetime is not unaffected from matter). Why do you get this result? The Einstein equations don't need the strings to be extracted. You extract them from minimizing what we call the "Action" in classical mechanics. Strings only come into play as a candidate to quantize gravity.
To quantify this for you, imagine that you have [itex]A=B[/itex]... A corresponds to the geometrical features of the spacetime, and B to the matter and radiation content you consider. If you change B, A will have to change too so you keep the equality. Of course the relation is different:
[itex]G_{\mu \nu}= 8 \pi G T_{\mu \nu}[/itex]
with [itex]G_{\mu \nu}[/itex] the Einstein tensor, [itex]T_{\mu \nu}[/itex] the energy momentum tensor and [itex]G[/itex] the Newton's gravitation constant.
When you want to talk about neutrinos passing through matter, well that needs extra knowledge on the physics of particle physics. Indeed the neutrinos can pass through matter, but that doesn't mean that a huge (super-huge) amount of neutrinos couldn't possibly cause some change in your spacetime curvature. However, when one talks about neutrinos interactions, he doesn't have in mind gravity- because their gravitiational interactions are very small in power compared to weak interactions they are subject to (to an order of [itex]10^{-25}[/itex] at "normal" energies- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction). The weak interactions however are so rare, that neutrinos indeed pass through matter unaffected. Or another way to state it, is by saying that the probability for a neutrino to interact is actually so small that in general, most of them, can pass through whole planets unaffected. Because of that, just seeing particles as small balls of some mass colliding with other balls, is actually a wrong idea - maybe this works only as a limit approximation and only "effectively".
On the other hand, as photons, so neutrinos can be subject to spacetime geometry, and so they follow the paths they do- for example their trajectories can be bend from a gravitational source (like a heavy planet, star or so on).
 
Last edited:
  • #14
Master Sashin said:
Im only in grade 10
Natsirt said:
I'm in 10th too.
I most strongly recommend that you learn Newtonian physics before trying to learn general relativity! It is like trying to do gymnastics before learning to crawl.
 

1. Why does spacetime warp around mass?

According to Einstein's theory of general relativity, mass and energy cause spacetime to curve. This is because mass and energy create a gravitational field, which in turn affects the curvature of spacetime.

2. How does mass affect spacetime?

The more massive an object is, the more it warps spacetime. This means that objects with larger masses will have a greater effect on the curvature of spacetime compared to smaller objects.

3. Does spacetime only warp around mass?

No, spacetime also warps around any form of energy. This includes things like light, heat, and even sound waves. However, the amount of warping is directly proportional to the amount of mass or energy present.

4. If spacetime warps around mass, does that mean mass is always present?

Not necessarily. Mass can exist in different forms, such as matter or energy. Even in the absence of physical matter, energy can still cause spacetime to warp. This is why light can be affected by gravitational lensing, even though it has no mass.

5. Can spacetime warp without the presence of mass or energy?

No, according to current theories, spacetime cannot warp without the presence of mass or energy. This is because these are the fundamental building blocks of the universe and are responsible for creating and shaping spacetime itself. Without them, there would be no spacetime to warp.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
779
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
989
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
796
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
41
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
404
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
1K
Back
Top