Why Does Supply Bypass Pull-Down Resistors While Electrostatic Voltage Doesn't?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of pull-down resistors in circuits, particularly in relation to supply voltage and electrostatic voltage. Participants explore the implications of these voltages on gate inputs, the concept of floating inputs, and the role of resistors in managing these voltages. The conversation touches on theoretical and practical aspects of circuit design.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why supply voltage bypasses pull-down resistors while electrostatic voltage does not, suggesting a potential misunderstanding of current paths.
  • Others assert that electrostatic voltage should also go past the pull-down resistor, indicating a lack of consensus on this point.
  • A participant emphasizes that pull-down resistors prevent floating inputs when switches are open, which is a common practice in laboratory settings.
  • There is a discussion about the need for diagrams to clarify the concepts being debated, with multiple requests for visual aids to enhance understanding.
  • Some participants note that current divides among parallel resistances, challenging the notion that there is only one path of least resistance for voltage.
  • A later reply introduces the concept of source impedance and its impact on static voltage accumulation at unused inputs of logic chips, suggesting that high resistance can mitigate this issue.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the behavior of supply and electrostatic voltages in relation to pull-down resistors, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the complexity of current paths in circuits and the influence of impedance, but there are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of terms like "past" and "through," as well as the specific nature of electrostatic voltage.

treehouse
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
When you use a pull-down resistor (resistor to ground) between a switch and a gate to prevent floating, why does the supply go past the pull-down but electrostatic voltage through the pull-down? Shouldn't it just go through whichever one has less resistance? Is there some kind of 'bandwidth rule' in play here?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


No idea what you are talking, a drawing would be helpful.
 


As far as I know electostatic voltage would go past the pull-down as well.
 


Floid said:
As far as I know electostatic voltage would go past the pull-down as well.

The pull-downs keep the gate inputs from floating. This much is obvious in my college's lab.
 


treehouse said:
When you use a pull-down resistor (resistor to ground) between a switch and a gate to prevent floating, why does the supply go past the pull-down but electrostatic voltage through the pull-down? Shouldn't it just go through whichever one has less resistance? Is there some kind of 'bandwidth rule' in play here?

yungman said:
No idea what you are talking, a drawing would be helpful.

treehouse said:
The pull-downs keep the gate inputs from floating. This much is obvious in my college's lab.

Well, that's about all that's obvious in this thread so far.

"Why does the supply go past the pulldown?" "but electrostatic voltage through the pulldown?"

I second the request for a diagram, and what do you mean by "past" and "through"? And what ESD voltage?
 


berkeman said:
I second the request for a diagram, and what do you mean by "past" and "through"? And what ESD voltage?
I don't know how to put a diagram here.

A resistor is placed between a switch and a gate input to keep the input from floating when the switch is open. The resistor is connected to the ground rail; vout is also connected the ground rail. The ground rail is connected to the negative side of the power supply - otherwise the circuit won't be live.

Electrostatic voltage is the voltage resulting from electrostatic interference that causes floating inputs.
 


treehouse said:
I don't know how to put a diagram here.

A resistor is placed between a switch and a gate input to keep the input from floating when the switch is open. The resistor is connected to the ground rail; vout is also connected the ground rail. The ground rail is connected to the negative side of the power supply - otherwise the circuit won't be live.

Electrostatic voltage is the voltage resulting from electrostatic interference that causes floating inputs.

If the gate's Vout is connected to ground, the gate output will not do much.

The pulldown resistor just sinks whatever bias current there is for the input to the gate. V=IR, so as long as the resistor is small enough (usually about 10k Ohms), that is enough to sink the small input bias current and pull the input down below Vih.

To add attachments, look for the paper clip icon above the posting/advanced-reply dialog box.
 


treehouse said:
I don't know how to put a diagram here.

A resistor is placed between a switch and a gate input to keep the input from floating when the switch is open. The resistor is connected to the ground rail; vout is also connected the ground rail. The ground rail is connected to the negative side of the power supply - otherwise the circuit won't be live.

Electrostatic voltage is the voltage resulting from electrostatic interference that causes floating inputs.

If you have a scanner, scan the drawing into jpg file and make it less than 60 to 80KB. I use:

www.tinypic.com

to upload. Copy the "IMG" link, click the Insert File ( with a paper clip) here and paste the link and wala, you have your drawing. I don't want to answer anything until I see the drawing.
 
Last edited:


Ohh, when you said electrostatic voltage I assumed you meant from ESD or the likes.
 
  • #10


The question is raised by us thinking that there is only one path of least resistance for a voltage.
 
  • #11


treehouse said:
The question is raised by us thinking that there is only one path of least resistance for a voltage.

Current divides among parallel resistances. It is not an all-or-nothing thing, with only the "path of least resistance" sustaining a current when a voltage is placed across multiple parallel resistances.

Still no diagram?
 
  • #12


berkeman said:
Current divides among parallel resistances. It is not an all-or-nothing thing, with only the "path of least resistance" sustaining a current when a voltage is placed across multiple parallel resistances.

Well, sure I've seen the supply voltage go through multiple gates from a rail too. I'm just wondering why these things happen.
 
  • #13


This depends on source impedance.

For example, a logic chip may have unused inputs and if these are not protected with resistors to ground, or to the supply voltage, the pin may acquire a static voltage because it can have an impedance of hundreds of megohms and it only takes a few electrons to charge its very small capacitance.

Placing even a very high resistance in parallel with the chip's impedance means that it becomes a lot harder to supply these electrons from a static charge and they can drain away through the resistor when the static charging source is removed.

Applying a "proper" drive signal, which has no problem supplying these electrons, drives the input successfully.

Early CMOS chips were reputed to be damaged by finger contact with the pins, so they were supplied in conductive foam or plugged through aluminum foil. Modern ones have internal protection for sensitive input pins.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
17K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
13K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
13K