Why does the amplitude <p |T| p'> have the dimension of a volume?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the dimensional analysis of the scattering amplitude

and its implications in the context of quantum mechanics, specifically regarding the relationship between the amplitude and cross sections. Participants explore the dimensions of various quantities involved, including the density matrix and the implications of these dimensions in scattering theory.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the dimension of the function f(q,q') as introduced in the book, seeking clarification on its relation to cross sections.
  • Another participant states that the scattering amplitude f has dimensions of inverse length, referencing basic scattering theory.
  • A later post corrects a previous statement, clarifying that f(q,q') actually has dimensions of length, not inverse length.
  • Participants discuss how the amplitude

    is perceived to have dimensions of volume, raising questions about the dimensional consistency with the density of probability.

  • There is mention of the density matrix and its relation to the scattering amplitude, with a focus on how these dimensions interact in the context of quantum mechanics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the dimensions of the scattering amplitude and its implications, indicating that there is no consensus on the dimensional analysis presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific equations and definitions from the book, which may contain assumptions or context that are not fully detailed in the discussion. The relationship between the amplitude and cross sections remains unresolved, with participants exploring different interpretations.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in quantum mechanics, scattering theory, and dimensional analysis may find this discussion relevant.

naima
Gold Member
Messages
936
Reaction score
54
Hello

I am reading this book: "[URL and the appearance of a classical word&f=false"]decoherence[/URL]
I hope someone could help me.
Please go to Appendix A1
Joos introduces the notation f(q,q'). What is the dimension of f from his notation?
Next page he writes that [tex]\int f^2 d\Omega d\Omega'[/tex] is a cross section.
do you understand why?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can't see anything like that at A1...
 
F(q,q') is defined in (A1.12)
Have you access to the book or just with my link (google book)?
 
The scattering amplitude f has dimensions of inverse length. This is basic scattering theory; see any book on QM for the relation between the scattering amplitude and the cross section.
 
Avodyne said:
The scattering amplitude f has dimensions of inverse length.

Good.

Lets us come to what follows.
[tex]\rho (x,x')[/tex] is the density matrix and we have
[tex]\Delta \rho (x,x') =- \rho (x,x') F(x-x') \Delta t[/tex]
F has the dimension of 1/T
Joos wants to prove that the density matrix diagonalizes as time grows.
[tex]F(x-x') = \int dq n(q) v(q) \int \frac{d\Omega d\Omega'}{2}(1 -exp[i(q-q')(x-x')])|f(q,q')|^2[/tex]
Then he writes: for large distances x-x', F approaches
[tex]2 \pi \int dq n(q) v(q) \sigma(q)[/tex]
with [tex]\sigma(q)[/tex] the total cross section

So my question is: if f(q,q') has the dimension 1/L how can we get a cross section (dimension of a surface)?

Thanks
 
Argh! Sorry, I meant length, not inverse length. You can see this from A1.12, where T is dimensionless, and [itex]\langle q'|q\rangle=\delta^3(q'-q)[/itex] has dimensions of length cubed (q' and q are three-vectors, each with dimensions of inverse length), and [itex]\delta(q'-q)[/itex] has dimensions of length (q' and q are now magnitudes of three-vectors).
 
Thank you Avodyne.

Your answer is very clear!
<p|p'> is a product of 3 dirac

I did the same mistake. I cannot easily understand how an amplitude <p |T| p'> has the dimension of a volume (and a density of probability a L^6 dimension)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K