Why does the Block have an Acceleration Only Downwards

  • Thread starter Thread starter decentfellow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Block
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a block placed on a movable wedge situated on a fixed incline. The inquiry focuses on understanding the motion of the block, specifically why it appears to have only a downward acceleration despite being on the wedge, and the implications of the frictionless assumption.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the block's motion being constrained by the wedge and question the validity of the assumption that the block can only accelerate vertically due to the absence of horizontal forces.
  • Some participants explore the idea that the block may lose contact with the wedge if the wedge accelerates too quickly, raising concerns about the completeness of the problem statement.
  • There is consideration of the role of friction and how it affects the interaction between the block and the wedge.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants examining different interpretations of the block's motion and the assumptions made in the problem. Some have offered insights into the mechanics involved, while others are still grappling with the implications of the problem's constraints.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem does not specify the length of the wedge's platform, which raises questions about the conditions under which the block might lose contact with the wedge.

decentfellow
Messages
130
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Block ##A## of mass ##m## is placed over a movable wedge of mass ##m##. Both the block and the wedge are placed over a fixed incline plane. Assuming all the surfaced to be smooth, calculate the displacement of the block ##A## in the ground frame reference in ##1s##.
pictur for question0001.png


Homework Equations


$$\vec{F}=m\vec{a}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


Before beginning, the question that I posed above is a solved example, and I am just confused about the motion of the block ##A##. So here goes.

The solution says that "Let acceleration of wedge in ground's frame is ##a## down the plane. The acceleration of block ##A## will be ##a\sin\theta## vertically downward"

Now, my problem is with the very first line of the solution, how can the block only have an acceleration down the plane, though in the solution, to justify the first line it is stated that "From FBD of A it is clear that Block A cannot accelerate horizontally, i.e. in ##x-##direction because there is no force acting on the block ##A## in ##x-##direction, hence block ##A## can accelerate in ##y-## direction only."
asdf.png


Though the explanation seems right in its place but before seeing the solution, my line of thought regarding the question was that as the block is constrained to move with the movable wedge hence it has an acceleration in the the direction along the plane. I don't know why but the explanation in the solution is just not sinking in.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
decentfellow said:
Though the explanation seems right in its place but before seeing the solution, my line of thought regarding the question was that as the block is constrained to move with the movable wedge hence it has an acceleration in the the direction along the plane.
I guess that the crux of the problem. Everything is assumed to be frictionless, so block A is not constrained to move with the wedge. As the wedge slides down the inclined plane, from the point of view of block A the "floor" is sliding from under it and moving down. Only the latter leads to any motion of block A.
 
One of the reasons to do a FBD is to isolate the forces on each component. If there is no friction between A and the wedge, then the only force on A is gravity, hence it must move vertically.

If there were friction between A and the wedge that would be a different matter.
 
DrClaude said:
Everything is assumed to be frictionless, so block A is not constrained to move with the wedge. As the wedge slides down the inclined plane, from the point of view of block A the "floor" is sliding from under it and moving down. Only the latter leads to any motion of block A.
After removing the constraint of them moving together, i.e. not considering the friction force which I was considering while visualizing the problem(unkowingly), and now that I have removed it I again have a doubt that doesn't it happen that as the wedge slides down the incline it so happens that the block looses contact with the movable wedge and moves along the incline, the only problem is that that the length of the platform on which the block stands is not given, so isn't the question incomplete.
 
decentfellow said:
After removing the constraint of them moving together, i.e. not considering the friction force which I was considering while visualizing the problem(unkowingly), and now that I have removed it I again have a doubt that doesn't it happen that as the wedge slides down the incline it so happens that the block looses contact with the movable wedge and moves along the incline, the only problem is that that the length of the platform on which the block stands is not given, so isn't the question incomplete.
If you moved the wedge fast enough, then the block would lose contact. But, the acceleration of the wedge is limited by gravity, so it can't out-accelerate the block.
 
PeroK said:
If you moved the wedge fast enough, then the block would lose contact. But, the acceleration of the wedge is limited by gravity, so it can't out-accelerate the block.
But in the (non-inertial)reference frame of the movable wedge there would be a pseudo force in the ##+ve x-## direction making it accelerate in that direction w.r.t the movable wedge so after some time when the block would have traversed the length of the wedge's platform on which it stands wouldn't it have partially lost contact with the wedge and have made contact with the fixed incline.
 
I guess that's why the problem asks for displacement for the first second, so that the block doesn't reach the inclined plane.
 
DrClaude said:
I guess that's why the problem asks for displacement for the first second, so that the block doesn't reach the inclined plane.
Yeah, you are right I think I am jumping to conclusions before even attempting it.
 
decentfellow said:
But in the (non-inertial)reference frame of the movable wedge there would be a pseudo force in the ##+ve x-## direction making it accelerate in that direction w.r.t the movable wedge so after some time when the block would have traversed the length of the wedge's platform on which it stands wouldn't it have partially lost contact with the wedge and have made contact with the fixed incline.
Yes, of course the block will eventually fall off the side of the wedge!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K