Why Does the Cross Product of î and ĵ Equal k̂?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AakashPandita
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The cross product of the unit vectors î and ĵ equals k̂, as established by the definition of the cross product in vector algebra. The correct formulation is given by the equation (a1, a2, a3) × (b1, b2, b3) = (a2b3 - a3b2, a3b1 - a1b3, a1b2 - a2b1). This discussion clarifies that the magnitude of the cross product is |a||b|sinθ, but the result itself is a vector, not a scalar. The properties of linearity and anti-commutativity are also essential in understanding the behavior of the cross product.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector algebra
  • Familiarity with unit vectors (î, ĵ, k̂)
  • Knowledge of the properties of the cross product
  • Basic grasp of linearity and anti-commutativity in vector operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the cross product in depth
  • Learn how to apply the cross product in three-dimensional space
  • Explore vector calculus applications involving the cross product
  • Investigate the geometric interpretation of the cross product
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, physics enthusiasts, and anyone studying vector calculus or linear algebra will benefit from this discussion on the cross product of vectors.

AakashPandita
Messages
157
Reaction score
0
how is î x jcap = kcap? Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know the definition of the cross product?
 
yes. a x b = absinθ
 
AakashPandita said:
yes. a x b = absinθ

Do you realize that the RHS of what you wrote is a scalar?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
AakashPandita said:
yes. a x b = absinθ
That's not the definition, and that equality isn't correct. You may be thinking of the result ##\left|\mathbf a\times\mathbf b\right|=|\mathbf a||\mathbf b|\sin\theta##, where ##\theta## is the angle between the two vectors.

There are many equivalent ways to define the cross product. One of them is
$$(a_1,a_2,a_3)\times(b_1,b_2,b_3)=(a_2b_3-a_3b_2,a_3b_1-a_1b_3,a_1b_2-a_2b_1).$$ You should check what definition your book uses, and then try to use it to prove that it implies that
$$\mathbf i\times\mathbf j=\mathbf k.$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Fredrik said:
That's not the definition, and that equality isn't correct. You may be thinking of the result ##\mathbf a\times\mathbf b=|\mathbf a||\mathbf b|\sin\theta##, where ##\theta## is the angle between the two vectors.

Again LHS is a vector, RHS is a scalar. :wink:
 
pwsnafu said:
Again LHS is a vector, RHS is a scalar. :wink:
LOL, yes I know. That's why I started typing that. Somehow I forgot to type the absolute value symbols on the left. I will edit my post.
 
Oh I understood. (ab sin theta) was only the magnitude.

Thank you very very much!
 
One good way of defining the cross product is to start with
1)\vec{i}\times\vec{j}= \vec{k}
2)\vec{j}\times\vec{k}=\vec{i}
3)\vec{k}\times\vec{i}= \vec{j}
Then extend it to all other vectors by "linearity" in the first component:
(\vec{u}+ \vec{v})\times \vec{w}= \vec{u}\times \vec{w}+ \vec{v}\times \vec{w}
and by "anti- commutativity":
\vec{u}\times\vec{v}= -\vec{v}\times\vec{u}

What you are asking about is (1) above.

Another, equivalent but less "sophisticated", way to define the cross product is to simply say that
(A\vec{i}+ B\vec{j}+ C\vec{k})\times(P\vec{i}+ Q\vec{j}+ R\vec{k})= (BR- CQ)\vec{i}- (AR- CP)\vec{j}+ (AQ- BP)\vec{k}

and then, \vec{i}\times\vec{j} has A=1, B= 0, C= 0, P= 0, Q= 1, R= 0
so the product is (0(0)- 0(1))\vec{i}- (1(0)- 0(0))\vec{j}+ (1(1)- 0(0))\vec{k}= \vec{k}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K