Why Does the Entropy Formula for a Fermionic Gas Include a Degeneracy Factor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kara386
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degeneracy Gas
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the entropy formula for a fermionic gas, specifically addressing the presence of a degeneracy factor, g_i. The entropy expression derived is S = -k_B Σ_i (1-f_i)ln(1-f_i) + f_i ln(f_i), where f_i represents the Fermi-Dirac distribution. A key point is that the g_i factor serves as bookkeeping to account for multiple states at the same energy level. The clarification provided indicates that the index i should label different states rather than energies, allowing for the simplification of g_i to 1 in certain contexts. Understanding this distinction is crucial for correctly applying the entropy formula in statistical mechanics.
Kara386
Messages
204
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


The question asked me to show that the entropy of a fermionic gas is
##S = -k_B \Sigma_i (1-f_i)\ln(1-f_i) +f_i\ln(f_i)##

Using the Fermi-Dirac distribution so ##f_i = \frac{n_i}{g_i}##.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


The number of microstates ##\Omega## is
##\Omega =## Π##\frac{g_i!}{n_i!(g_i-n_i)!}## and using ##S = k_B ln(\Omega)## I've arrived at the expression:
##S = -k_B \Sigma_i g_i (1-f_i)\ln(1-f_i) +f_i\ln(f_i)##
So there's an unwanted factor of ##g_i##. I'm told it is meant to be there, and I need to explain why it can be set to 1. Something to do with i being the state index and a quantum state can't be degenerate. Could someone explain that to me? Any help is much appreciated! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Kara386

First observation here is that you need some big brackets in your equations - for example in your first equation, the k_B should be multiplying everything, not just the first term.

The business with the g_i is just bookkeeping. In their formula they're using the index i to label different states, and in your formula you're using the index i to label different energies. Your formula includes a g_i factor in it to allow for the possibility that there might be lots of states with the same energy.
 
  • Like
Likes Kara386
Oxvillian said:
Hi Kara386

First observation here is that you need some big brackets in your equations - for example in your first equation, the k_B should be multiplying everything, not just the first term.

The business with the g_i is just bookkeeping. In their formula they're using the index i to label different states, and in your formula you're using the index i to label different energies. Your formula includes a g_i factor in it to allow for the possibility that there might be lots of states with the same energy.
Thanks! I thought that might be it, because although originally the sum was over multiple states taken to be at the same energy, I think the introduction of the average ##f_i## allows the sum to be over individual states.

Thanks for your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K