Why does the finite square well problem require numerical solutions?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The finite square well problem in quantum mechanics, as outlined in Griffiths 4.9, requires numerical solutions due to the complexity of the boundary conditions. The wave functions in the two regions are defined as uI = A sin(K r) for r ≤ a and uII = De^-kr for r > a. When applying boundary conditions, the resulting equations cannot be solved analytically, necessitating numerical methods to find intersections of cot(z) and sqrt[(zo/z)^2-1]. This approach provides insights into the bound states of the system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wave functions.
  • Familiarity with boundary conditions in differential equations.
  • Knowledge of numerical methods for solving equations.
  • Proficiency in graphing functions and interpreting intersections.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study numerical methods for solving differential equations in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the implications of boundary conditions in quantum systems.
  • Explore the relationship between wave function solutions and energy levels in potential wells.
  • Investigate graphical methods for analyzing intersections of functions in physics problems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in quantum mechanics, physicists working with potential wells, and anyone interested in the numerical analysis of quantum systems.

MGWorden
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Introduction to Quantum Mech Griffiths 4.9for the problem of a finite square well

v(r) =

{-Vo r<= a (i will call section I)

0 r>a (section II)

Homework Equations



After I find uI and uII

uI = A sin(K r)
uII = De^-kr

and then set the boundary condition

uI = uII at a equation 1
uI' = uII' at a equation 2

next i know I divide equation 2 by equation 1

The Attempt at a Solution

then i set Kr = z and

zo = sqrt(2mVo) a / h

and then i graph it with cot(z) and sqrt[(zo/z)^2-1] and look for the intersections.

But I don't know why I do this, or what the graph means.

It tells me something about the bound states but I don't know what or why.

My teacher said it is used to solve the problem numerically, but why does it need to be solved numerically?

So any information on what this step in the solving process is for would be great
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MGWorden said:

Homework Statement



Introduction to Quantum Mech Griffiths 4.9


for the problem of a finite square well

v(r) =

{-Vo r<= a (i will call section I)

0 r>a (section II)


Homework Equations



After I find uI and uII

uI = A sin(K r)
uII = De^-kr

and then set the boundary condition

uI = uII at a equation 1
uI' = uII' at a equation 2

next i know I divide equation 2 by equation 1
What's the equation you finally end up with? It would help us to see that and also any equations relating k and K to the energy of the state and the depth of the well.

The Attempt at a Solution




then i set Kr = z and

zo = sqrt(2mVo) a / h

and then i graph it with cot(z) and sqrt[(zo/z)^2-1] and look for the intersections.

But I don't know why I do this, or what the graph means.

It tells me something about the bound states but I don't know what or why.

My teacher said it is used to solve the problem numerically, but why does it need to be solved numerically?

So any information on what this step in the solving process is for would be great
When you match the solutions at the boundary, you should get an equation you can't solve analytically, so you have to do it numerically.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
959