Why does the force increase when holding a bag at an angle of 45 degrees?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

When two people hold a bag at a 45-degree angle, the force required by one person alone is approximately 1.4 to 1.5 times greater than when both are holding it. This increase in force is due to the need to balance the vertical components of the gravitational force acting on the bag. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding vector addition and the role of vertical and horizontal force components in this scenario.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector addition in physics
  • Familiarity with the SOHCAHTOA rule for trigonometric calculations
  • Basic knowledge of force components (horizontal and vertical)
  • Concept of rigid body mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of vector addition in physics
  • Learn about force components and their applications in mechanics
  • Explore trigonometric functions in the context of physics problems
  • Investigate rigid body dynamics and equilibrium conditions
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of force application in practical scenarios.

Physicsterian
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
Hi,

If 2 people are holding a bag at an angle of 45 degrees each, and then only person is going to hold it, it is being said that the force that will have to be applied by that one person will be 1.5 times greater than when he was applying it together with the other. Can anyone explain this or provide a source where I can find information on it considering I am just a beginner in the area (I can work with the SOHCAHTOA rule and know how to break gravity force in its X and y component).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physicsterian said:
HI,
Welcome to PF!
If 2 people are holding a bag at an angle of 45 degrees each, and then only person is going to hold it, it is being said that the force that will have to be applied by that one person will be 1.5 times greater than when he was applying it together with the other. Can anyone explain this or provide a source where I can find information on it considering I am just a beginner in the area (I can work with the SOHCAHTOA rule and know how to break gravity force in its X and y component).
Bag? As in non-rigid? I don't see how a person can hold a non-rigid bag at a 45 degree angle. As soon as one person let's go of the bag it will swing toward the other person. Maybe it would help if you draw a picture of what you are referring to.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Physicsterian
If you hold handles of a bag at an angle then you have a horizontal and a vertical component of the force. Only the vertical component contributes to holding the bag up, the horizontal one does not (the two people "pull on each other" indirectly via these forces). A force balance can show how large each component is. Then you can compare it to the case of one person holding the bag with vertical handles.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Physicsterian
Physicsterian said:
If 2 people are holding a bag at an angle of 45 degrees each, and then only person is going to hold it, it is being said that the force that will have to be applied by that one person will be 1.5 times greater than when he was applying it together with the other. Can anyone explain this or provide a source where I can find information on it considering I am just a beginner in the area (I can work with the SOHCAHTOA rule and know how to break gravity force in its X and y component).

Forces add as vectors:

MC_09.jpg


More:
https://www.antonine-education.co.uk/Pages/Physics_2/Mechanics/MEC_02/Mechanics_2.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclidean_vector#Addition_and_subtraction
 

Attachments

  • MC_09.jpg
    MC_09.jpg
    19.6 KB · Views: 806
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Physicsterian
It helps me to know that I need to focus on the vertical components and thanks a lot for the valuable sources. I threw an eye over it and I am quite sure, it will make me understand the concept.

I assume it is a rigid body, since the complexity of the questions is said to be easy and have a practical character.

It initially feels kinda complex, as not much info is provided; no force and not even the weight of the object is given, only that the force that needs to be applied is 1.5 times greater in situation b. I need to proof why is it 1.5x greater. The approach that seems most wise to me is choosing a random value for the weight, and applying the trigs in the sources from that point on. Do you think my approach sounds proper?

Thanks a lot in advance
20180823_211319.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • 20180823_211319.jpeg
    20180823_211319.jpeg
    33 KB · Views: 706
Here is the weight: ##x##. You don't have to pick a numerical value, the weight will cancel in the ratio later.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Physicsterian
Physicsterian said:
I need to proof why is it 1.5x greater.
It's actually closer to 1.4, so don't get hung up on the 1.5 approximation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Physicsterian
Thanks a lot everybody, for the support.

I indeed eventually arrived at 1,4, good to know, that takes away some doubt :)! The X that I found calculating it the way I did it, is a ratio number and not the weight. Am I doing it mathematically/systematically correct? Or is it maybe better to say delta W = x or formulate it slightly differently?

The websites you sent me are very useful in answering many other questions I was having difficulties with, so that will keep me busy for the coming couple of days.

Thanks again!
20180825_010106.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • 20180825_010106.jpeg
    20180825_010106.jpeg
    26.2 KB · Views: 667
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
721
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K