Why Does the Fourier Transform of Autocorrelation Equal the ESD?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dionysian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Autocorrelation
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the Fourier transform of the autocorrelation function and the energy spectral density (ESD) of the original signal, referencing the Wiener-Khinchin theorem. This theorem states that the power spectral density (PSD) is the Fourier transform of the autocorrelation function, highlighting that a rapidly decaying autocorrelation indicates high-frequency components in the signal. The conversation emphasizes the intuitive understanding of this relationship, particularly how a sharply peaked autocorrelation results in a broad spectrum. Participants suggest consulting textbooks for a deeper mathematical derivation and further insights into the theorem's implications in various fields. Overall, the discussion underscores the significance of the Wiener-Khinchin theorem in signal processing and related disciplines.
dionysian
Messages
51
Reaction score
1
Does anyone here have a good explanation of why the Fourier transform of the autocorrelation function equals the ESD of the the original signal. It kind of make sense intutively because functions that have a autocorrelation that drops of quickly are high frenquency and the Fourier transform of that resulting function will obviuosly have a wide bandwidth but it seems like there should but a analytic derivation of this.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
dionysian said:
Does anyone here have a good explanation of why the Fourier transform of the autocorrelation function equals the ESD of the the original signal. It kind of make sense intutively because functions that have a autocorrelation that drops of quickly are high frenquency and the Fourier transform of that resulting function will obviuosly have a wide bandwidth but it seems like there should but a analytic derivation of this.
Please be careful: ESD and PSD (energy and power spectral density) are not interchangeable.
You are inquiring about the Wiener-Khinchin theorem, which states that the PSD is the Fourier Transform (FT) of the autocorrelation function (and vice versa). Here is an online mathematical derivation:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Wiener-KhinchinTheorem.html"
The W-K is intuitively reasonable. It predicts, for instance, that a sharply peaked autocorrelation function R transforms to a broad power density spectrum. Think about a random noise signal for which R is a delta function; the FT of a delta is a uniform spectrum, and indeed random noise has a white spectrum. Other examples are also easily imagined.
I recommend that you check out the discussion in a textbook for more details. The W-K theorem is discussed in every text on Fourier transforms, signal processing, and if you are a physicist, statistical mechanics (because of the interest in characterizing random fluctuations).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ahhh haa... I just found that in one of my books. Thanks. I just needed someone to point me in the right direction.
 
I am trying to understand how transferring electric from the powerplant to my house is more effective using high voltage. The suggested explanation that the current is equal to the power supply divided by the voltage, and hence higher voltage leads to lower current and as a result to a lower power loss on the conductives is very confusing me. I know that the current is determined by the voltage and the resistance, and not by a power capability - which defines a limit to the allowable...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K