Why Does the Measured Force Decrease as Distance Increases in Circular Motion?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ry122
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Moment Torque
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the phenomenon of decreasing measured force in circular motion as the distance from the center of rotation increases. The setup involves a ruler connected to a coil spring, with force measured using a Newtonmeter. The key conclusion is that the torque exerted by the spring, which is non-zero when attached at a distance from the center, results in a force that decreases proportionally with distance, as described by the equation f = t/r. This relationship explains why force measurements at varying distances yield different values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of circular motion dynamics
  • Familiarity with torque and its calculation
  • Knowledge of force measurement using a Newtonmeter
  • Basic principles of spring mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between torque and force in rotational systems
  • Explore the principles of circular motion and centripetal force
  • Learn about the mechanics of springs and their applications in rotational motion
  • Investigate the mathematical derivation of the equation f = t/r in various contexts
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of force and torque in circular motion systems.

Ry122
Messages
563
Reaction score
2
I have a ruler which is connected to a spring that causes the ruler to move in a circular motion around the spring.
When I measure the force with a Newtonmeter at the top of the ruler it is less than it is at midpoint.

So my question is, why is it that the force exerted decreases as the point where force is being measured from increases.
I thought it might have something to do with torque, however
the force is created in the center of circular motion and not at point r, so i don't know if this equation applies or not:
t=f x r.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, it would help me if you could explain the setup in a little more detail. It sounds as if you have a spring (coil spring?) attached to the ruler very near the center of the rotation. If it's literally at the exact point, then it can't exert a torque, as you've suggested, but that means the ruler wouldn't rotate, either. The fact that it does rotate means there is a non-zero torque, so your spring must be attached at some non-zero r from the center of rotation. r might be very small, but it can't be zero if the spring is exerting a torque, which is necessary for rotational motion.

That said, once you agree that there is a torque on the ruler, then the first part of your question becomes easier to answer. The same torque produces the forces you measure at the two points on the ruler, so the force will be given in each case as f = t/r (assuming you're measuring the force perpendicular to the ruler). If the second r is twice the first, then the force measured there will be half what you measured at the first r.

Make sense?
- Bruce
 
Yep that makes sense thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
944
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K