Why does this integral lead to zero, while the other does not.

  • Thread starter FOIWATER
  • Start date
  • #1
FOIWATER
Gold Member
434
12
why does this integral:

double integral (x+y) dA , A is the area bounded by the triangle with vertices (0,0) (0,1) (1,0)
equal 1/3

While this one, (x-y) dA , A is the area bounded by the same vertices
equal 0?

(not looking for the math, already worked them out, just looking for some logic behind why the second one would be zero).

Thanks!
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
lurflurf
Homework Helper
2,432
132
well for the same domain

∫x dA=∫y dA=1/6

and integration is linear
 
  • #3
1,013
70
Also, geometrically, it implies the function z = x - y has the same volume below the plane z = 0 restricted to that region as above it. Since the integral is geometrically measuring the signed volume between z = x - y and z = 0 restricted to that region, the two different signed volumes precisely cancel.
 
  • #4
349
1
Your integral is like the sum of the values of f(x,y) over the region. You are looking at a region that is symmetric with respect to reflection across the line y=x. In other words, for each (a,b) in your region, the reflected point (b,a) is also in the region.

For the function f(x,y)=y-x, notice that f(y,x) = -f(x,y). So when you add up the values of f over the region, they cancel each other out. By similar logic, the following functions would all yield 0 when integrated over the same region:
sin(x-y)
(x-y)^2sin(x-y)
5(y-x)+10(y-x)^7
 
  • #5
FOIWATER
Gold Member
434
12
makes sense can't believe I didn't see it.

Thanks, guys
 

Related Threads on Why does this integral lead to zero, while the other does not.

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
11K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Top