Why does x1i =r1 -y1j in Lorentz electromagnetic force?

  • Thread starter Thread starter retupmoc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electromagnetism
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Lorentz electromagnetic force and a specific notation in a physics text. The user expresses confusion regarding the equation x1i = r1 - y1j, questioning its derivation and the use of the Pythagorean theorem. Clarification is provided that the equation refers to the vector representation of r, defined as r = xi + yj, and emphasizes that the magnitude of r is calculated using the Pythagorean theorem, resulting in |r| = √(x² + y²). The distinction between the vector r and its magnitude is highlighted as a key point of understanding. Additionally, a follow-up question is raised about the equation vy1k = v x r on page 6, indicating further inquiry into the relationships between velocity and position vectors in the context of the discussion.
retupmoc
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
When going over my notes on the lorentz electromagnetic force in my physics 3 electromagnetism class got a bit puzzled by one statement that seems just to be taken for granted. Could anyone help me and tell me why x1i =r1 -y1j on page 5 on http://www.physics.gla.ac.uk/~dland/ELMAG305/Elmag305txt1.pdf where frame 1 is the stationary frame and 2 the frame moving with velocity v to the right of frame 1

If its just by using pythagorus wouldn't the above quantities (x,y and r) be to the second power. i just can't get my head around this and realize its probably something really straight forward. any help would be much appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
the vector r = xi + yj by definition, see the figure on the previous page.

Using the Pythograean theorem you get the magnetude of r.

\mid \hat {r} \mid = \sqrt { x^2 + y^2 }

You are dealing with the VECTOR r. See the difference?
 
Last edited:
haha yeah i do now and realize how obvious that was, thanks
 
Another quick question, why on page 6 of the slide does vy1k = v x r?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'

Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'

So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Two ways of constructing electromagnetism, which is correct?
Replies
7
Views
1K
Magnetic Lorentz Force: Questions & Answers
Replies
4
Views
2K
Can the Lorentz Force be understood non-relativistically?
Replies
2
Views
1K
Magnetic Levitation (electromagnets?) for an 11th grader
Replies
3
Views
2K
Lorentz force on a charge due to a moving magnet
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Why is my magnetic levitation experiment not working?
Replies
22
Views
3K
EMF induced in moving rod in B-field, why is "L" length of wire frame?
Replies
4
Views
746
I Charge movement relative to magnetic field frame dependence/invariance
Replies
5
Views
856
About Lorentz force and Lenz' law
Replies
11
Views
5K
What Causes the Lorentz Force in Electromagnetism?
Replies
3
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top