Why doesn;t Carbon show deviation from electron configuration

Click For Summary
Carbon's electron configuration is 1s2- 2s2- 2p2, reflecting its stable arrangement. The discussion highlights that while half-filled and fully filled orbitals are generally more stable, carbon does not adopt a configuration like 1s2- 2s1- 2p3. This is primarily due to the energy differences between the 2s and 2p orbitals, which do not favor the transfer of an electron from 2s to 2p. In contrast, elements like chromium exhibit a different behavior because of the energy levels of their orbitals, allowing for electron rearrangement to achieve stability. The comparison emphasizes that the stability gained from half-filled orbitals is not sufficient to overcome the energy considerations in carbon's case. For a deeper understanding, additional resources are suggested.
Azer2
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
We all know that carbon shows the configuration 1s2- 2s2- 2p2
But, since half-filled and fully filled orbitals are more stable, why doesn't it show the configuration 1s2- 2s1- 2p3 ?
Why doesn't the 2s orbital give 1 electron to 2p, as in the case of Chromium, where one electron goes from 3d to 4s, in order to make both orbitals half-filled(and hence more stable)?

Thanks in advance!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Think about the energy differences between the 2s and 2p orbitals, and then think about it for the 4s and 3d orbitals. You should see that there is a difference when trying to compare carbon and chromium.

If you need further elaboration, I'd check out the following explanation:

http://www.mikeblaber.org/oldwine/chm1045/notes/Struct/EConfig/Struct08.htm
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
27K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K