Why Doesn't a 1.5V Battery Shock You?

  • Thread starter Thread starter IMGOOD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Battery Shock
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the reasons why a 1.5V battery does not produce a noticeable electric shock when touched with fingers, exploring concepts of electrical resistance, sensation thresholds, and comparisons with higher voltages. Participants also discuss static electricity and its effects, as well as personal experiences with various voltage levels.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Personal anecdotes

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the high resistance of human skin prevents a 1.5V battery from delivering a sufficient current to cause sensation.
  • Others note that sensation thresholds vary, with voltages above 60V typically required for sensation, while mucosal surfaces have lower resistance.
  • There are claims about the safety of voltages, with some participants referencing industry standards that consider 40V as the maximum safe exposure voltage.
  • Participants share personal experiences with higher voltages, such as 50V DC and 220V AC, discussing the sensations and dangers associated with them.
  • Static shocks from everyday activities can reach several kV, yet are generally not considered dangerous due to low current flow.
  • One participant explains that while high voltage can be dangerous, it is the current that ultimately poses a risk to life.
  • There is a discussion about the threshold energy of electrostatic discharge (ESD) and its potential danger to humans, with references to medical practices involving defibrillators.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the relative dangers of AC versus DC, with differing opinions on which is more hazardous.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the resistance of the body plays a significant role in the sensation of electric shocks, but there are multiple competing views regarding the dangers of different voltages and the specifics of how electricity affects the body. The discussion remains unresolved on some points, particularly regarding the comparative dangers of AC and DC.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying definitions of safety thresholds, the influence of skin moisture on resistance, and the specifics of current flow through the body during electric shocks. There is also uncertainty regarding the exact voltage levels that can cause harm.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals exploring electrical safety, the effects of voltage on the human body, and those curious about personal experiences with electricity.

  • #31
IMGOOD said:
That's what I don't get. How can a 10kV generator pass more current through your body than a 10kV static shock? Shouldn't the current be the same in both cases? By Ohm's law, I = V/R and if you assume that your body has some finite resistance, then at a particular voltage (10kV in this case) the same amount of current should be passing through body, right?

Think in terms of source impedance and energy storage. With your body, it's not a constant 10kV source voltage with a low output impedance. Your body is only a handfull of pF worth of energy storage, and the shock event depletes the charge to almost zero very quickly.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
IMGOOD, I see what you're saying.

However, I think everything isn't always as simple as Ohm's law, or we are viewing the problem the wrong way.

Ultimately, the static potential is just that - a potential, with little to no capability to "pump" a lot of current.

However, a 10kV generator, spun by a large mechanical prime mover, can pump out lots and lots of amps (and thus V*I=power).

I don't know if these are exactly realistic numbers (atleast for the path resistance), but let's assume the following:

Let's assume you are holding your hands across the armature windings of a giant, spinning,dc generator ( I wouldn't recommend this), and compare to a static discharge when moving from your desk:

Vstatic=10 KV
Istatic= 0.0001 A (negligble amount of amps the static discharge can source)
Vgenerator=10 KV
Igenerator(max)(due to winding resistance limitations, prime mover limitations etc etc)= 500 A.
Rgenerator(armature)=10 Ohm

Rpathofhuman= 990 Ohm, Rpath_effective=Rgenerator+Rpathhuman=1000 Ohm

So, the static electricity can only source 0.0001 A. So, the "power" dissipated by you when you move from the chair is:

P=V*I= 0.0001 A * 10 kV = 1 w (it doesn't matter that I=Vstatic/Rpath=10A, there's no way a static discharge is going to source 10A @ 10,000 kV , else everyone would be fried by standing up from their desk.. :) )

The generator, could source up to 500A. However, since Reffective=1000 Ohm, it will only source, depending on the speed (back emf) (assume low):

I=V/R= 10kV/1000=10A
So, P=V*I = 10,000 V * 10A = 100,000 W (i.e. you are toast)

I'm not sure if this is a good analogy, someone correct me if I'm way off base.
I'm not really willing to do a real experiment on it :)
 
  • #33
berkeman said:
The static shock would have to get into your heart or brain, which doesn't usually happen with real-world zapping yourself accidentally. Defibs use conductive gel to help get the shock into your chest (at two points to cross the chest cavity with the current), and the heart is not beating anyway.

Bottom line is that low-energy ESD shocks shouldn't normally be dangerous. But as you say, shocks from other sources with more energy can be dangerous.
I mean data relating typical path (like arm-chest-arm-ground or head-legs-ground).
What's the lower limit considered dangeorous for adults when it comes to ESDs (1 Joule,10 Joules,100 Joules..)?
Here are two examples:
1)http://www.sciencefirst.com/vw_prdct_mdl.asp?prdct_mdl_cd=10060
Small shock from a small electrostatic generator with 150 KV output

and...

2) http://www.mos.org/sln/toe/cage.html
Without Faraday cage protection ,produced would be a very strong ,and potentialy leathal shock, from a giant electrostatic generator of 1500 kV output.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #34
Hey berkeman,

I just got a response that 50 Joules from 100pF capacitance,if discharged directly,can knock you down with no problem.
Well well how about that...
 
  • #35
tehno said:
Hey berkeman,

I just got a response that 50 Joules from 100pF capacitance,if discharged directly,can knock you down with no problem.
Well well how about that...

That's kinda stupid. A 100 pF capacitor would have to be charged to a million volts to store 50 J. Good luck finding such a capacitor.

50 J is also the kinetic energy liberated when a 0.3 lb baseball hits you at 60 mph. That'll knock you down, too.

- Warren
 
  • #36
What are the biggest outlets around? There's a 600V in our school's lab.
 
  • #37
Easier than you expect

chroot said:
That's kinda stupid. A 100 pF capacitor would have to be charged to a million volts to store 50 J. Good luck finding such a capacitor.
Not that I'm looking for it ,but a 5 feet diameter smooth metal ball elevated 5 feet above ground plane is kinda construction plan for such a capacitor.:smile:
For starter,not very complicated I think :biggrin: .
BTW,see the link above I found about giant Van de Graaf in Boston ( ~8' spheroids)!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
54
Views
12K
Replies
47
Views
11K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K