Why doesn't a weak acid/base act as a buffer on its own?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sungholee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Act Buffer Weak
Click For Summary
Weak acids cannot function as effective buffers on their own due to their limited ability to resist pH changes. A buffer typically consists of a weak acid and its conjugate base, which together maintain a stable pH. When a weak acid (HA) dissociates, it produces H+ and A-, but if only HA is present, the addition of H+ will react with A- until it is depleted, preventing further neutralization of H+. This highlights the importance of having both components in a buffer system.The discussion also touches on the concept of percent ionization, which indicates that as the concentration of a weak acid increases, the percentage of molecules that dissociate decreases. This non-linear relationship means that higher concentrations of weak acids do not provide a proportional increase in H+ ions, further emphasizing the need for a conjugate base to maintain buffer capacity. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping the fundamentals of acid-base chemistry, especially for future studies in chemistry.
sungholee
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello. I am a high school level student and I had a question about weak acids/bases and why they wouldn't work as a buffer on its own.

If the dissociation of a weak acid is HA \rightleftharpoons H^{+} + A^{-}, then when we add OH^{-}, it will react with the H^{+} to form water. Because the concentration of the products had been decreased, more HA will dissociate. It's very simple for me upto this point.

But the problem is when we add H^{+}, it will react with the A^{-} to form HA. Then, according to Le Chatelier's principle, wouldn't the HA dissociate, because its concentration is greater than the products? What I have been told is that now no more H^{+} can be neutralized because all of the A^{-} have been used up, and that's why we need a salt of the acid, to provide that A^{-}. However, I fail to see why the A^{-} would work differently to H^{+}.

Of course, I can pretend I understand it and simply memorise it, but I'll be studying chem in uni so I want to have a strong understanding of the basics.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Hi, are you asking for example why a weak acid alone would not act as a buffer? ...As opposed to the typical buffer being a weak acid and conjugate base mixture?
 
In essence, yes I am.
 
It is a matter of how effective a solution is at maintaining the constant pH. If it resist pH changes we call it a buffer, when it doesn't - we don't. Resistance to pH changes is called a buffer capacity. And it is highest for pH=pKa, goes down the further from the pKa we are.

See derivation and plot here: buffer capacity.
 
Well, you can't really have a weak acid by itself, as far as I know. It will always partially dissociate into its conjugate base, reaching equilibrium. This is in contrast with a strong acid, which dissociates essentially completely.

I think maybe more related to what you are asking though is something called percent ionization. This is a simple ratio of the concentration of H+ over the concentration of HA (expressed as a percent). Weak acids have small percent ionizations, for example 0.2 M HNO3 would only have a percent ionization of about 4.8% (so like 5 molecules out of 100 dissociate).

Now maybe sort of an unintuitive thing happens, when you increase the concentration of a weak acid, the percent ionization actually decreases. In other words a smaller fraction of the weak acid molecules dissociate. So like a 2.5 M HNO3 solution has a percent ionization of 1.4% (now only like 1 out of 100 dissociate). (I am just getting these vaules from a text) Its still the case that the concentration of H+ is greater for the higher molarity, but the (percent) amount of dissociation that occurs is less.

So in other words the dissociation of HA isn't a linear relationship with concentration, as (if I am reading you right) you might be thinking.
 
I came.across a headline and read some of the article, so I was curious. Scientists discover that gold is a 'reactive metal' by accidentally creating a new material in the lab https://www.earth.com/news/discovery-that-gold-is-reactive-metal-by-creating-gold-hydride-in-lab-experiment/ From SLAC - A SLAC team unexpectedly formed gold hydride in an experiment that could pave the way for studying materials under extreme conditions like those found inside certain planets and stars undergoing...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K