Crazy Tosser
- 182
- 0
Why doesn't it violate Law of Conservation of Energy?
Isn't it energy that comes out of nowhere?
Isn't it energy that comes out of nowhere?
The discussion revolves around the question of whether gravity violates the Law of Conservation of Energy (LoCE). Participants explore the nature of gravity, its relationship to energy, and the implications for conservation laws in various scenarios.
Participants express differing views on the relationship between gravity and energy, with no consensus reached on whether gravity violates the Law of Conservation of Energy. Multiple competing perspectives remain throughout the discussion.
Some discussions involve assumptions about the definitions of energy and potential energy, as well as the conditions under which energy conservation is evaluated. The implications of gravitational work and its independence from the path taken are also points of contention.
Crazy Tosser said:Why doesn't it violate Law of Conservation of Energy?
Isn't it energy that comes out of nowhere?
Crazy Tosser said:Why doesn't it violate Law of Conservation of Energy?
Isn't it energy that comes out of nowhere?
It can be shown that if you move an object from a position A to B, then the work done by gravity will be independent of the path: it depends only on the points A and B. So we can define gravitational energy in general point B as work done by gravity when the object moves from A to B (we can chose any A, this just affect a constant in the energy). Consequently energy will be conserved once we add gravitational energy.Crazy Tosser said:Why doesn't it violate Law of Conservation of Energy?
Isn't it energy that comes out of nowhere?