Why don't I hear beats when singers or instruments play the same note?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Isaac0427
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency
AI Thread Summary
When two singers or instruments sing or play the same note at slightly different frequencies, a phenomenon called "beats" is expected, where the volume oscillates at the difference in frequencies. However, this effect may not be perceptible due to factors like the precision of tuning, the use of vibrato by singers, and the complex nature of sound perception. In orchestras, even if individual instruments are slightly out of tune, the overall sound can mask these beats, leading to a more harmonious blend rather than distinct oscillations. The human ear has limitations in detecting very low beat frequencies, which can further obscure the experience. Understanding these acoustical principles can clarify why beats are often not heard in musical performances.
Isaac0427
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
718
Reaction score
163
Consider this: two singers are both singing an A4. These singers, like any human, are not perfect. One sings 440 Hz and one sings 441 Hz. So, theoretically, I should hear an amplitude oscillation with a frequency of one second, right? I never seem to hear this kind of effect, though it should happen if both members of a duet sing the same note, right? It would seem highly improbable that both singers would be singing the same exact frequency. Why do I never hear beats?

The same thing for an orchestra. If the violin section is all playing the same note, if any of the violins are not tuned to the same exact frequency, there should be a beat. I don't hear these beats in orchestras either. Would the violins (or singers in the first example) just be 100% in tune or is there another physics concept explaining the absence of beats.

It just feels a little weird that no violin would even be a tenth of a hertz off.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have ever tuned up a musical instrument such as a guitar, the "beats" is what you listen for as you bring the string you are tuning to match the same note played (on a higher fret) of an adjacent string. When some members of an orchestra play notes out of tune, I think the disharmonious sound that you hear is often these "beats".
 
What is the lower range of your hearing? Can you hear a 1 hertz beat?

Wikipedia says that the lower range of human hearing is 31 hertz.
 
anorlunda said:
What is the lower range of your hearing? Can you hear a 1 hertz beat?

Wikipedia says that the lower range of human hearing is 31 hertz.
You hear a volume change that occurs at the "beat" frequency. The volume cycles up and down. You hear the note such as the 440 Hz A, but instead of a steady volume, if there is a f=435 Hz sound accompanying it, you'll get a volume change at 5 Hz.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes pixel
Singers use vibrato, which might mask any beat frequency present. Violin players also.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
pixel said:
Singers use vibrato, which might mask any beat frequency present. Violin players also.
That makes sense. The last question I just thought of is this: I simultaneously play an A4 and an A#4 on a piano. I should get about a 27 Hz beat frequency, but it doesn't appear to have that. I know that a frequency like that is hard to tell but when my computer generates it I can definitely tell the beats. Is there something about most musical instruments that beats can be masked?
 
Charles Link said:
You hear a volume change that occurs at the "beat" frequency. The volume cycles up and down. You hear the note such as the 440 Hz A, but instead of a steady volume, if there is a f=435 Hz sound accompanying it, you'll get a volume change at 5 Hz.

Ok, I guess I was wrong. But hearing can be complex. What about a 440 tone and a 500 tone. Do you hear two pure tones with no interference? Or a 60 hz volume swing? Or 440/500/60 hertz tones?

Different effects at different beat frequencies? The OP was about 1 hertz beat.

When I push 1 on a phone, I hear the dual tone 697 and 1209 hertz. I hear no 512 hertz beat.
 
anorlunda said:
Ok, I guess I was wrong. But hearing can be complex. What about a 440 tone and a 500 tone. Do you hear two pure tones with no interference? Or a 60 hz volume swing? Or 440/500/60 hertz tones?

Different effects at different beat frequencies? The OP was about 1 hertz beat.

When I push 1 on a phone, I hear the dual tone 697 and 1209 hertz. I hear no 512 hertz beat.
The "beat" that you hear in tuning a guitar string often starts out a several Hertz and in the process of getting it in tune, (by adjusting the tuning peg), you'll hear the beat frequency decrease steadily to zero= beats almost absent as you match the frequencies. ## \\ ## Editing... I think some of the harmonious sound that you hear when you play a C and a G at the same time is a combination of beat frequencies at higher frequencies that are subharmonics of the fundamental notes.
 
Charles Link said:
The "beat" that you hear in tuning a guitar string often starts out a several Hertz and in the process of getting it in tune, (by adjusting the tuning peg), you'll hear the beat frequency decrease steadily to zero= beats almost absent as you match the frequencies.
About the beats being "almost absent," if you play 440 Hz and 440.01 Hz at the same time, after ~40 seconds would you get a ~20 second period of a very low amplitude? That just seems weird to me, but it seems like it would be true. The weirder thing is it's implications on acoustics: even if your tuner is accurate to the .0001 Hz, if you need to play a note for a long time, the note will be nearly inaudible for quite a while. Am I understanding this correctly?
 
  • #10
Isaac0427 said:
About the beats being "almost absent," if you play 440 Hz and 440.01 Hz at the same time, after ~40 seconds would you get a ~20 second period of a very low amplitude? That just seems weird to me, but it seems like it would be true. The weirder thing is it's implications on acoustics: even if your tuner is accurate to the .0001 Hz, if you need to play a note for a long time, the note will be nearly inaudible for quite a while. Am I understanding this correctly?
A very good question...I'm not an acoustics expert, but one problem that occurs with trying to make an ideal model of two point sources each at an individual frequency is that the wavelengths involved are reasonably large and the receiver, such as the human hearing the sound has two ears, so that the person who is the receiver isn't localized at a single point in space. If you use a simple model of the sounds though, intensity ## I=(Acos(\omega_1 t)+Acos(\omega_2 t))^2=4 A^2(cos^2((\omega_1+\omega_2)t/2) cos^2((\omega_1-\omega_2)t/2) ##. This last beat frequency term is ## cos^2((\omega_1-\omega_2)t/2)= (1+cos((\omega_1-\omega_2)t))/2 ## where ## \omega=2 \pi f ## in all cases. This case would represent what I think would be considered 100% amplitude modulation. In practice, the modulation of the beats never cancels completely, and in many cases, e.g. if the notes are almost in tune, it can be harder to pick it up=i.e. I think the percentage of amplitude modulation might be much less, but it might take someone with more expertise in acoustics to give a more complete answer.
 
  • Like
Likes Isaac0427
  • #11
Isaac0427 said:
It would seem highly improbable that both singers would be singing the same exact frequency
How far apart would you expect them to be, and why?

I would recommend that you take a sample of the same piano playing the same note once with a very long sustain and once staccato. Then look at the FFT of each sample.

Similarly with the beats that you expect to hear but are not hearing. Analyze the signals to get a good intuition for the topic
 
Last edited:
Back
Top