Why don't induced charges cancel each other out?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter OmegaKV
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Induced
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of induced charges on a thin conducting sheet when a positive charge is brought near it. A negative charge is induced on the side closest to the positive charge, while a positive charge of equal magnitude appears on the opposite side to maintain electrical neutrality. The electrostatic field is influenced by monopole and dipole contributions, as described by multipole expansion, where the total charge of the conductor is zero except for the monopole term. The discussion also highlights that the distribution of induced charges is uniform across the sheet, despite intuitive expectations of variation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics and charge interactions
  • Familiarity with multipole expansion in electrostatics
  • Knowledge of Green's functions in electrostatic problems
  • Concept of electric field and charge distribution
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the multipole expansion of electrostatic fields in detail
  • Learn about Green's functions and their applications in electrostatics
  • Explore the behavior of electric fields near conductors using simulation tools
  • Investigate the effects of charge distribution on electric fields in various geometries
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding electrostatic principles and charge distribution in conductive materials.

OmegaKV
Messages
22
Reaction score
1
If you bring a positive charge near a thin conducting sheet, it will induce a negative charge on the side nearest to the charge. And in order for the conducting sheet to remain electrically neutral, a positive charge of equal magnitude will be induced on the other side.

How could the conductor have any significant effect at all on the total electric field? It seems to me like the field from the induced positive and negative charges should "cancel out" everywhere except for points very close to the conducting sheet (i.e. points not much greater than the thickness of the sheet).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have a look at the multipole expansion of the electrostatic field. It starts with a monopole contribution, i.e., a Coulomb field with the total charge of the body as charge in the Coulomb field. Then comes a dipole term, which you can depict as two opposite point charges very close to each other, then a quadrupole term which you can depict as two dipoles very close to each other and so on. Except the very first monopole term the sources of all other terms are equivalent to charge distributions with total charge 0.

There are two examples, where you can solve this kind of problem exactly: A point charge in front of a infinite conducting half-plane or a point charge close to a conducting sphere. Having solved the problem for a point charge, you have in principle also solved it for any charge distribution close to the conductor since what you evaluate there is the Green's function of the electrostatic problem with given boundary conditions due to the conductor.
 
OmegaKV said:
If you bring a positive charge near a thin conducting sheet, it will induce a negative charge on the side nearest to the charge. And in order for the conducting sheet to remain electrically neutral, a positive charge of equal magnitude will be induced on the other side.
Why are you sure that positive and negative charges will have equal distribution on the whole sheet? Intuitively, we may expect more negative net charge at the point below the positive charge, and more positive net charge towards the edges of the sheet.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
980
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K