Why ether proves speed of light?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oerg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ether
Oerg
Messages
350
Reaction score
0
When Einstein conducted thought experiments, he imagined himself moving at the speed of light with a mirror in front. He was later forced to discard the idea of ether and he concluded that light must travel at the speed of light regardless of wherever and whatever speed an observer is moving.

My question is: How does discarding the idea of ether make him conclude the constancy of the speed of light?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oerg said:
When Einstein conducted thought experiments, he imagined himself moving at the speed of light with a mirror in front. He was later forced to discard the idea of ether and he concluded that light must travel at the speed of light regardless of wherever and whatever speed an observer is moving.

My question is: How does discarding the idea of ether make him conclude the constancy of the speed of light?

He believed Maxwell's electromagnetic theory, and without an ether, that theory says c is constant.
 
If you were to detect a change in the speed of light, you would be detecting the ether. Think about this for a few moments. Imagine waves rippling on the surface of a pond, if you start moving then the speed of the waves will change relative to you. The idea is the same.
 
The ether theory predicted that Maxwell's laws would only work exactly in a single inertial reference frame, the rest frame of the ether. In other frames the equations governing electromagnetism would look different, according to the ether theory. Einstein discarded this idea, and tried to see how things would have to work in order for Maxwell's laws to work exactly in every inertial reference frame.
 
Oerg said:
My question is: How does discarding the idea of ether make him conclude the constancy of the speed of light?

It was the other way. Assuming that the speed of light is constant, together with the fact that in Maxwell´s equations any movement relative to an ether does´t have any observable consequences, he concluded that the concept of an ether was no longer needed.
 
Quite right Ich - no longer needed - but not necessarily obviated
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top