Why friction plays no role in this non-slipping billiard ball problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter andresB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Friction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the non-slipping billiard ball problem, emphasizing that friction is negligible during the impact due to the brief duration of the collision. Theoretical treatment indicates that the force exerted during the impact is significantly greater than the static friction, which can be ignored for calculations. The collision time for billiard balls is approximately 250-300 microseconds, supporting the assertion that friction does not play a role in this scenario. The solution aligns with the equations of force and torque, confirming the non-slipping relationship between angular and linear accelerations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with torque and angular acceleration concepts
  • Knowledge of static friction and its limitations
  • Basic principles of impulse and momentum
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the dynamics of collisions in billiard physics
  • Learn about the mathematical modeling of frictionless surfaces
  • Explore the concept of impulse and its applications in mechanics
  • Investigate the effects of collision time on force calculations
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of billiard ball collisions and the role of friction in motion analysis.

andresB
Messages
625
Reaction score
374
Homework Statement
Consider the following exercise
Relevant Equations
.
245504


===================

Now, I can get the solution in the book by writing and solving the force and the torque equations together with the non-slipping relation between the angular acceleration and the center of mass acceleration. However, the book solution only arises if there no friction between the ball and the table.

I don't get why friction is not taken into account.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
andresB said:
Problem Statement: Consider the following exercise
Relevant Equations: .

View attachment 245504

===================

Now, I can get the solution in the book by writing and solving the force and the torque equations together with the non-slipping relation between the angular acceleration and the center of mass acceleration. However, the book solution only arises if there no friction between the ball and the table.

I don't get why friction is not taken into account.
It's to do with (the theoretical treatment of) sudden impulses.
The impact is taken as consisting of an arbitrarily large force acting for an arbitrarily brief time. Only the product of these, the momentum, is knowable.
The friction between the ball and the table is limited by ##\mu_smg##. Over the arbitrarily short period of the impact, that can only exert an arbitrarily small impulse, so can be ignored.
The situation is different if there is a vertically downward component to the delivered impulse, since there will be a corresponding component to the normal force, and hence to the frictional force.
 
So, the idea is that in the short duration of the hit, the force (horizontally) hitting the ball is just much bigger than the static friction. Is that an accurate assumption in the case of actual billiard balls and tables?
 
andresB said:
So, the idea is that in the short duration of the hit, the force (horizontally) hitting the ball is just much bigger than the static friction. Is that an accurate assumption in the case of actual billiard balls and tables?
Yes, and yes.
According to http://dbkcues.ru/articles-2/collision-of-billiard-balls/?lang=en, the collision time is around 250-300μs. Plug in numbers for the speed and mass and see what the forces must reach.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: andresB

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K