edward
- 73
- 165
The only ones I have dispaly in the subject line.
The discussion revolves around the disappearance of emoticons from the reply box in a forum interface, exploring user experiences, preferences, and the implications of this change on usability. Participants share their thoughts on the emoticon functionality, including the organization of emoticons in the interface and the coding of emoticons.
Participants express a mix of preferences and concerns regarding the emoticon changes, with no clear consensus on whether the new arrangement is beneficial or detrimental. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to emoticon accessibility and coding.
Some participants mention usability issues related to the dropdown menu and the coding of emoticons, indicating a potential preference for simpler codes. There is also a reference to a past event involving emoticons, which may influence current perceptions.

Doc Al said:Look in the pulldown menu next to the smiley face. Right above you.![]()
OOPS, thanks Doc Al...or perhaps for evil.En_lizard said:they've moved there for good?

Doc Al said:...or perhaps for evil.![]()
Danger said:Hmmm... thanks for the tip. I've just been typing in the codes, but I prefer clicking.
While we're on the subject, why is it that the 'surprised' smilie doesn't have a trailing colon while all of the others do? Isn't that the 'end smilie' symbol?
Moonbear said:Apparently, the smilies have always been up there in the drop down menu, so were redundant to have hanging out next to the reply box too...not that I had noticed them up in the drop-down menu until they disappeared from next to the reply box either.
neutrino said:While we are on the topic of emoticons/smilies, here's a question to the powers that be: Why do smilies such as,
,
, etc. have such long codes instead of the simpler :), :D, ;)?
Danger said:So if I type something between two colons, will I get a randomly generated smilie or just stupid-looking text?![]()