Why is a small nut attracted to a straw whereas it should be repulsed?

Click For Summary
A small metal nut tied to a string is observed to be attracted to a charged straw, contrary to expectations that it should be repelled. The discussion suggests that the nut's electrons may redistribute, causing a positive charge on the side closest to the straw. It is emphasized that generating free electrons on an insulator like the straw is not feasible, and static electricity experiments can be affected by humidity. Alternatives such as using lighter materials like balloons or washers are recommended for better results. The overall consensus is that the current setup may not effectively demonstrate the intended electrostatic principles.
  • #31
You transfer charge from straw to both nuts at the same time or one after the other? But either way, I don't see why would you expect the nuts to end with the same charge.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
nasu said:
You transfer charge from straw to both nuts at the same time or one after the other? But either way, I don't see why would you expect the nuts to end with the same charge.
Let's say I have only one nut and after rubbing the straw, the nut is attracted to it, so if I put the straw far enough so that the nut can't touch it, what would be their distance ##r##, when I then want to use formula ##F_\mathrm e=k\frac{Q^2}{r^2}##? The distance between the center of mass of the charged part of the straw and the center of mass of the nut? And will their charges have the same value? I think yes, but I am no sure. I think I know how to conduct the measurement now, but I need to make sure I understand some crucial points.
 
  • #33
Lotto said:
So, I have tried to rub two tied balloons against my hair and they were repeling each other, but the problem is that I need them to have the same charges, so that I can say ##F_\mathrm e=k\frac{Q^2}{r^2}##.
Why do you need to be able to say that?
If the initial charges are q0 and Q0, what is the repulsive force at distance r, time t?
 
  • #34
haruspex said:
Why do you need to be able to say that?
If the initial charges are q0 and Q0, what is the repulsive force at distance r, time t?
Since I must determine ##Q## of the straw. I must use this equation ##Q(t)=Q_0 \mathrm{e} ^{-\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon}t}##. So when I calculate ##Q## (by using geometry) and know its ##t##, I can use fitting with an amount of these datas and determine ##\sigma##.
 
  • #35
Lotto said:
Since I must determine ##Q## of the straw.
Do you? Please answer my question in post #33.
 
  • #36
haruspex said:
Why do you need to be able to say that?
If the initial charges are q0 and Q0, what is the repulsive force at distance r, time t?
The repulsive force is ##F_\mathrm e =k\frac {q_0 Q_0}{r^2}## in this case, but I must be able to calculate ##Q## of the straw dependent on time, see post #12. I can do so by measuring the distance ##r##, and then by using geometry, I can determine ##F_\mathrm e## thanks to the deflected nut/washer. Then I calculate ##Q## as ##Q=2r\sqrt{\pi \epsilon F_\mathrm e}##.
 
Last edited:
  • #37
Lotto said:
The repulsive force is ##F_\mathrm e =k\frac {q_0 Q_0}{r^2}## in this case, but I must be able to calculate ##Q## of the straw dependent on time, see post #12. I can do so by measuring the distance ##r##, and then by using geometry, I can determine ##F_\mathrm e## thanks to the deflected nut/washer. Then I calculate ##Q## as ##Q=2r\sqrt{\pi \epsilon F_\mathrm e}##.
You did not answer the question I asked. What is the force at time t? What is the ratio between that and the force at time 0?
 
  • #38
haruspex said:
You did not answer the question I asked. What is the force at time t? What is the ratio between that and the force at time 0?
I am not sure whether I understand, but $$F_\mathrm e (t)=\frac{Q_0 k q}{r^2} {\mathrm e}^{-\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon} t}=F_\mathrm{e_0} \left(\frac{r_0 }{r }\right )^2 \frac{q}{q_0} {\mathrm e}^{-\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon} t}.$$ So
$$ \frac{F_\mathrm e (t)}{F_\mathrm {e_0}}=\left(\frac{r_0 }{r }\right )^2 \frac{q}{q_0} {\mathrm e}^{-\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon} t}$$
But why do we need it?
 
Last edited:
  • #39
You don't need the actual values of Q and Qo. And it would be very difficult to find them. You just need to find how the ratio ##Q/Q_o## depend on some distance or angle in your specific setup. Then you will plot this (distance or angle) versus time.
 
  • #40
nasu said:
You don't need the actual values of Q and Qo. And it would be very difficult to find them. You just need to find how the ratio ##Q/Q_o## depend on some distance or angle in your specific setup. Then you will plot this (distance or angle) versus time.
Well, I am actually supposed to determine ##Q## dependent on time, see post #12.
 
  • #41
However, let's say I have only one nut and after rubbing the straw, the nut is attracted to it, so if I put the straw far enough so that the nut can't touch it, what would be their distance ##r##, when I then want to use equation ##Q=2r\sqrt{\pi \epsilon F_\mathrm e}##? The distance between the center of mass of the charged part of the straw and the center of mass of the nut? And will their charges have the same value? I think yes, but I am no sure.
 
  • #42
Lotto said:
Well, I am actually supposed to determine ##Q## dependent on time, see post #12.
No, it says find the product of the charges, qQ. But if the purpose is to find ##\sigma## then you do not even need to find that.
 
  • #43
Lotto said:
Well, I am actually supposed to determine ##Q## dependent on time, see post #12.
There is no such requirement in the post #12. Using that formula does not mean that you need to know Q.
 
  • #44
Lotto said:
I am not sure whether I understand, but $$F_\mathrm e (t)=\frac{Q_0 k q}{r^2} {\mathrm e}^{-\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon} t}=F_\mathrm{e_0} \left(\frac{r_0 }{r }\right )^2 \frac{q}{q_0} {\mathrm e}^{-\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon} t}.$$ So
$$ \frac{F_\mathrm e (t)}{F_\mathrm {e_0}}=\left(\frac{r_0 }{r }\right )^2 \frac{q}{q_0} {\mathrm e}^{-\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon} t}$$
But why do we need it?
Since you are working with two balloons, both discharging, the equations are $$F_\mathrm e (t)=k\frac{Q(t)q(t)}{r^2} =k\frac{Q_0q_0}{r^2} {\mathrm e}^{-2\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon} t} =
F_\mathrm{e_0} \left(\frac{r_0 }{r }\right )^2 {\mathrm e}^{-2\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon} t}$$.
Using the angle, you will measure F(t) and r(t), so you can plot.. what against what to find ##\sigma##?
 
  • #45
haruspex said:
Since you are working with two balloons, both discharging, the equations are $$F_\mathrm e (t)=k\frac{Q(t)q(t)}{r^2} =k\frac{Q_0q_0}{r^2} {\mathrm e}^{-2\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon} t} =
F_\mathrm{e_0} \left(\frac{r_0 }{r }\right )^2 {\mathrm e}^{-2\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon} t}$$.
Using the angle, you will measure F(t) and r(t), so you can plot.. what against what to find ##\sigma##?
I understand, but I won't do it with balloons, I will do it this way: I will rub the straw and then made the washer deflect because it will be attracted to the straw (but the straw will be far enough so that it won't touch it). Then I will measure the distance between the washer and the straw. What can I say about their charges? If the straw has a charge ##Q##, what charge has the washer? It is attracted, so it must have a charge, maybe only a partial one, but still some. Isn't its charge the same as ##Q## (in value)? Or are their charges different? I know it doesn't matter, but it interests me.

And I still think that when I am to measure the dependence of the straw's self-discharge on time, I am to measure its ##Q## dependent on time, but that is only my opinion.
 
Last edited:
  • #46
Lotto said:
Or are their charges different? I know it doesn't matter, but it interests me.

And I still think that when I am to measure the dependence of the straw's self-discharge on time, I am to measure its ##Q## dependent on time, but that is only my opinion.
Since the problem statement only expects you to be able to find the product of the charges, the question setter clearly understood that you cannot find the individual charges in the asymmetric (washer and straw) model.
Different discharge rates is a problem, though. You can only find the sum of the ##\sigma## values.
With two balloons you can assume the discharge rates are the same, but I am not sure about washer and straw.
Lotto said:
what charge has the washer? It is attracted, so it must have a charge,
No, even an uncharged conductor will be attracted because of the induced charge distribution.
 
  • #47
haruspex said:
No, even an uncharged conductor will be attracted because of the induced charge distribution.
And can I say that the washer has a partial charge, that it has on one side a negative charge and on the other side a positive charge?
 
  • #48
Lotto said:
And can I say that the washer has a partial charge, that it has on one side a negative charge and on the other side a positive charge?
If this is in the case where you touched the straw against the washer, both will have a negative charge overall, and the side of the washer away from the straw will be negative.
On cursory analysis, the side of the washer near the straw may be positive or negative. But maybe a more detailed view would resolve that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K