I thought I would post this question here rather than in the Classical Physics formum because I expect the GR experts might be better able to answer this.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I'm trying to get a phyisical/intuitive/geometrical explanation for why the charge-density/current 3-form (sometimes called a 4-vector and often referred to as J) is a twisted form.

By "twisted form" I mean a differential form that can be defined on a nonorientable manifold. It's clear to me why a 3-form is appropriate for J, but I can't seem to fathom why a twisted form is needed.

I think a key part of my question is that I don't really understand (aside from some non-intuitive mathematical statements) the important differences between a conventional differential form and a twisted differential form.

Any insight, even if incomplete, will be greatly appreciated.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Why is charge/current density 4 vector a twisted differential 3-form?

Loading...

Similar Threads - charge current density | Date |
---|---|

I Charged black hole - static electric field lines | Feb 1, 2018 |

A Is there any test of GR involving charges/currents? | Mar 15, 2017 |

Are the directions of charge flow (=current?) absolute? | May 12, 2011 |

Do Total Current and Total Charge form a Lorentz Covariant Vector. | Mar 20, 2011 |

Why is a wire with a current not charged? | May 12, 2006 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**