Why Is Conduct Not Equivalent to Absorb in Experiments?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jack1234
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 6K views
jack1234
Messages
132
Reaction score
0
conduct vs absorb (q34)

For this question
http://tinyurl.com/2wcw83
the answer is d.

May I know why c is not the answer?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
jack1234 said:
For this question
http://tinyurl.com/2wcw83
the answer is d.

May I know why c is not the answer?
Absorbing heat means that heat energy is accumulating in the mass/material. Conducting heat simply means that heat is moving into or through the material, but it does not imply that heat is accumulating.

If there is a temperature difference between ends or sides of the rod, the heat will move (be conducted) through the rod, but the internal energy will not necessarily increase, especially if the boundary conditions (temperatures) are constant.