Why is Electrical Potential Energy Dimensionally Inconsistent?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the dimensional consistency of electrical potential energy equations, specifically V=(q1q2)/(4*pi*epsilon*r) and V=Q/(4pi*epsilon*r). The latter is dimensionally consistent, while the former raises confusion regarding its physical meaning despite appearing inconsistent. The participant seeks clarity on deriving these equations from Coulomb's law, F=kq1q2/r^3, and questions potential misconceptions. Ultimately, the dimensions of both equations are confirmed to be consistent upon review.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law and electrostatic forces
  • Familiarity with electrical potential and energy concepts
  • Knowledge of dimensional analysis in physics
  • Basic grasp of electrostatics and charge interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electrostatic potential from Coulomb's Law
  • Learn about dimensional analysis techniques in physics
  • Explore the implications of dimensional consistency in physical equations
  • Review the principles of electrostatics and energy calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching electrostatics, and professionals involved in electrical engineering who seek to deepen their understanding of potential energy and dimensional analysis in physical equations.

skp524
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
In the case of two charges separarted at a distance r, the electrical potential energy follows that V=(q1q2)/(4*pi*epslion*r), I want to ask why the dimenision of this equation is not consistent and this equation still has a physical meaning. From a textbook about electricity and magnetism, the equation is often in a form like V= Q/4pi*epslion*r, however, this equation has a dimension consistency . I am confused because initially I want to derive this equation from the common form of Coulombs' law ( F=kq1q2r/|r|^3), but if I follow this form, it would probably give the former equation that is not dimensionally consistent. I wonder if I got any misconception(s) .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]V= \frac{Q}{4\pi \epsilon \,r}[/tex] is an electrostatic potential at the point [itex]r[/itex] from the charge [itex]Q[/itex].
[tex]E= \frac{Q_1Q_2}{4\pi \epsilon \,r}[/tex] is an electrostatic energy of two charges [itex]Q_1[/itex] and [itex]Q_2[/itex] at the distance [itex]r[/itex].

Check dimensions (units) again! They are consistent.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K